Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614DEC001886922
14 juin 2022
14 juin 2022
Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018). 6.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243396
30 avril 2025
30 avril 2025
The medical reports drawn up during the applicant’s custody noted several bruises and marks on his body.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-349
6 octobre 2011
6 octobre 2011
In March 2007 the mayor brought proceedings against the two applicants before the criminal court, which in July 2007 found them guilty of “public defamation against a citizen holding public office” and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0524DEC002498705
24 mai 2007
24 mai 2007
On 27 December 2004 the applicant asked the Public Prosecutor at the Court of Cassation to bring the case before the Court of Cassation. On 28 December 2004 the latter dismissed her request.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1304
8 octobre 2009
8 octobre 2009
The association replied that a meeting had been held and that steps were being taken to bring the charter into line with the statutory requirements.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-451299-452082
21 novembre 2001
21 novembre 2001
Fogarty v. the United Kingdom - Mary Fogarty is an Irish national, born in 1959 and living in London.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-157293
24 août 2015
24 août 2015
On 9 May 2011 the first instance court gave custody to the applicant which the second instance court confirmed on 26 March 2013.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-123858
9 juillet 2013
9 juillet 2013
Arial; font-weight:bold; text-decoration:underline; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } FOURTH SECTION Application no. 59494/09 Robert BRIGGS-PRICE
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913DEC000024903
13 septembre 2005
13 septembre 2005
On 26 March 1999 the investigator refused to institute criminal proceedings regarding the death of Mr M.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113737
14 mars 2011
14 mars 2011
requesting to investigate the events relating to the blood transfusion of 1 March 2005. 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0626DEC005373100
26 juin 2003
26 juin 2003
On 4 March 1999 he was convicted of two charges of robbery and two of carrying imitation firearms.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1210DEC004074798
10 décembre 2002
10 décembre 2002
On 27 May 1993 the applicant’s counsel requested a meeting with the prosecutor before a decision whether to bring charges against the applicant be taken.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5426
12 mars 2002
12 mars 2002
12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 40 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205022
9 septembre 2020
9 septembre 2020
avoid; page-break-after:avoid } Communicated on 9 September 2020 Published on 28 September 2020 THIRD SECTION Application no. 12546/20 Nikolay Vasilyevich OVCHINNIKOV against Russia lodged on 3 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-186637
6 septembre 2018
6 septembre 2018
on 15 June 2017 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns allegations that the three applicants, minor at the material time, were mistreated by a police officer in a police car on 21 March
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1029
30 mars 2010
30 mars 2010
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 128 March
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177373
4 septembre 2017
4 septembre 2017
On 30 March 2011 the Novosibirsk Regional Court upheld the decision on appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3942
22 mars 2005
22 mars 2005
12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 73 March
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5743
29 mars 2001
29 mars 2001
12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 28 March
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6032
20 janvier 2000
20 janvier 2000
In March 1996 he made a new application directly to the Indictments Chamber which was rejected. He did not lodge an appeal on points of law against that decision.
Source officiellePage 15 sur 448