On an unspecified date in 2004 the applicants complained of the abduction to the Gudermes District prosecutor’s office in Chechnya and the Oktyabrskiy District prosecutor’s office in Grozny

    On 14 April 2011 and 14 March 2012 respectively, the Bucharest Fourth District Court allowed the applicant’s complaints.

On 9   April 1998 the Makariv District Court (“the District Court”) opened proceedings. 6.     In a judgment of 28   December 1998 it dismissed the applicant's action.

Court of Kharkiv, 15/06/2009   2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 17/09/2009   3) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 17/06/2010   4) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 17/11

    On 23 September 2004 the Supreme Court of Serbia upheld the judgment of the Novi Sad District Court.

Phillips , Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 March 2007, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

  Stephen Phillips   Boštjan M. Zupančič   Deputy Registrar   President APPENDIX   No.

  Stephen Phillips   Mark Villiger   Deputy Registrar   President         ANNEX   No.

    On 27 January 1999 the Ljubljana District Attorney’s Office lodged charges against J.

in Nizhniy Novgorod (the District Court).

    On 2 August 2001 the Cherkassy District Court suspended the proceedings as the fourth applicant had absconded.

    On an unspecified date the Shevchenkivsky District Court of Zaporizhzhya (“the District Court”) received the case. 10.

Zupančič, President,   Helena Jäderblom,   Aleš Pejchal, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar .

    Le Tribunal des mesures de contraintes du district de Zurich («   Tribunal des mesures de contraintes   ») rejeta plusieurs demandes de libération déposées par le requérant. 7.

Serghides, judges, and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 7   July 2007, Having regard to the observations submitted by the respondent Government

    On 29 April 2009 the Krasnoarmeyskiy district investigation division of the investigative committee at the Volgograd regional prosecutor’s office (“the Krasnoarmeyskiy district investigative

    On 18 January 2006 Ms L., an investigator of the Primorskiy district prosecutor’s office in St Petersburg, asked the head of the Primorskiy district police to identify relatives of the deceased

    On 29 January 2013 the Kirsanovskiy District Court of the Tambov Region (“the District Court”) granted the applicant’s claims in part.

On 10 May 1994 the Kyustendil District Court terminated the proceedings and referred the case to the Kyustendil District Prosecutor’s Office for possible criminal prosecution of the applicant for falsely