If not, what was the applicant’s reason for not doing so?  

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES Given the seriousness of what was at stake for the applicant and the fact that he had had a legal representative during the first-instance proceedings, was the lack of legal assistance

statements in defence - period between publication of Act of 31 December 1991 and implementing decree of 12   July 1993 had been unacceptably long; (ii) administrative courts: crucial importance of what

Law – Article   35 §   3   (b): The Court first sought to assess what was at stake in the dispute financially.

However, the seriousness of a violation had to be assessed taking into account both the applicant’s subjective perception and what was objectively at stake in a particular case.

In this connection, what steps were taken by the applicants during that period in order to find out what had happened to their relative?   2.

In particular:   (a) What remedies under the Code of Criminal Procedure were available to the applicant in respect of the searches of his law office and his home, respectively?

Law – Article 35 § 3 (b) (a)     Significant disadvantage – What mattered when examining whether or not the applicant had suffered a significant disadvantage was the damage allegedly suffered

What were the consequences for the applicant of the refusal to recognise her as an Estonian citizen?

What is the relevant date to be taken into account?

    In what way and by whom was the land in question used since the date of the cadastral survey?   3.

In particular: (a)     What was the legal basis for the decision to exclude from the list of voters patients who had suffered from psychiatric disorders but were not placed under guardianship

    What is the current situation of the land subject to the application?

    What was the applicant’s post in unit no. 2430 at the material time? May equivalent posts be held by servicewomen? What was the post of the applicant’s wife?   2.

    The Government are requested to inform the Court what kind of medical examination the applicants underwent during their detention, what diagnoses were established, what medical treatment

What was his procedural status? What confessions and/or statements (« явка с повинной; показания ») did he give during that period?

were not given sufficient opportunities to submit their defence arguments after the reclassification of the charge against them, that the domestic courts did not provide adequate reasoning to show on what

When and by what authority was the postal address assigned to the house? Was the applicant registered as a resident in the house and, if so, by what authority?

In particular, what injuries did he sustain on 8 March 2012? What was the basis for the diagnosis of concussion given to the applicant on 9 and 10   March 2012?

He contends that he had received only one such form in 1966; he asked what it was and what he was to put on it; he was told to answer "yes" to two questions and added his signature and the date.