CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-162988
22 avril 2016
of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Page 15 sur 80
Chambre 6 - Référés Pdt
Portalis DBZ5-W-B7J-J4PP du rôle général S.A. ALBINGIAc/S.E
67ed9e36da9e15c513201db0
1 avril 2025
Code de procédure civile, que les opérations d’expertise leur soient rendues communes et opposables.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1217DEC005272799
17 décembre 2002
Relevant domestic law Article 339 (1) of the Civil Code reads as follows: “Any person who unlawfully causes damage to another shall be liable to pay compensation.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1117DEC005891508
17 novembre 2009
The President advised the applicant that if he wished to file a civil action, he should do so in compliance with the criteria set out in the Code of Civil Procedure. C.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1209DEC004779799
9 décembre 2004
At the relevant time and until 1998 the Chief Public Prosecutor could institute review (cassation) proceedings under Article 225 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, thus intervening in a civil dispute.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC004158898
23 mars 2004
Article 342 § 1 of the Criminal Code provides: “A person who is not a civil servant and who forges an official document by way of the methods specified in Article 339 shall be imprisoned for between two
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0527DEC006097400
27 mai 2004
Article 6 § 1, in so far as relevant, provides as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0626DEC003322196
26 juin 2001
The striking out procedure, now contained in the Part 3.4(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules in force since 1999, is regarded as an important feature of English civil procedure, performing the function of
ECLI:CEDH:001-120089
30 avril 2013
Relevant domestic law The relevant provisions of the Civil Procedure Code of 2004 as worded in the material time read as follows: Article 74. Judicial notices ( судові повістки ) “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1129DEC005130899
29 novembre 2001
A preliminary investigation ( proanakrisi ) was initiated ex officio immediately, pursuant to Article 243 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0304DEC002880295
4 mars 1997
proceedings claiming damages under Article 57 of the Civil Code or Article 105 of the law introducing the Civil Code.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0307DEC002390894
7 mars 1996
These additional punishments are, inter alia, confiscation of goods and claims referred to in Section 33a of the Criminal Code (Wetboek van Strafrecht, hereinafter referred to as "CC").
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0626DEC002638495
26 juin 1996
The Code of Civil Procedure The lawfulness of the decisions of administrative organs can be examined by courts in accordance with Part 5 of the Code of Civil
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD000092605
13 janvier 2009
and examined in accordance with the procedure set forth in Articles 189 bis and 315 bis of the Code of Criminal Procedure in order for the prosecution to be valid or admissible; those provisions leave
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1028JUD002292493
28 octobre 1998
The relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“CCP”) are worded as follows: Article 2 “Anyone who has personally suffered from damage directly caused by a criminal offence may
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1118DEC004875899
18 novembre 2003
Relevant domestic law and practice Article 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1964 (CCP) then in force provided that regional and higher courts may conduct “supervisory review” of the activities
12e chambre
6032214c35e50e58881e48c5
10 avril 2018
700 du code de procédure civile, - ordonné la capitalisation des intérêts suivant l'article 1154 du code civil, - ordonné l'exécution provisoire sans constitution de garantie, - condamné la société
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0607DEC003046413
7 juin 2022
The relevant parts of Article 205 of the (new) Code of Criminal Procedure enacted on 1 October 2010 (which replaced a previous version of the Code) read as follows: Article 205 – Pretrial
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1211DEC005305999
11 décembre 2001
THE LAW The applicant alleges a violation of Article 7 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1026JUD005969600
26 octobre 2006
He made the following request: “Under Article 331 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, I [hereby] request the [Moscow City] Court to quash the decision of the Butyrskiy District Court concerning adjournment