CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1203JUD000730812
3 décembre 2020
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0828JUD001230716
28 août 2018
Having regard to the fact that the applicant was accused of an “offence” under this Code and the imputed facts concerned the protection of public health (see paragraph 9 above), the punitive nature of
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0109DEC002267793
9 janvier 1995
        The facts as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows.   A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD003572912
17 décembre 2013
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicants were born in 1947 and 1975 respectively and live in Budapest. 6.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0915DEC006631911
15 septembre 2020
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. First set of proceedings 4 .
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0825JUD000991282
25 août 1987
Le même jour, le requérant a fait savoir au greffier qu’il renonçait à en déposer un. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD002802005
5 décembre 2013
The applicant also drew the Court’s attention to the fact that the pronouncement of the judgment had taken place at night.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD000020015
21 novembre 2019
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1968 and lives in Vienna. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0921JUD001710190
21 septembre 1994
to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, even though the Inspectors’ report did disclose new material facts.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003929409
30 juin 2015
principles embodied in Article 10 (see, among many other authorities, Zana v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0829JUD001995892
29 août 1997
Nor can the general principles of the criminal law prayed in aid by the applicants avail them in the circumstances.”
cr
61372626cd58014677423510
27 novembre 2002
à PARIS, le vingt-sept novembre deux mille deux, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller CHANUT et les observations de Me BOUTHORS, avocat en la Cour ; Vu la communication faite
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1114JUD005732519
14 novembre 2023
THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1978 and lives in Skopje. He was represented by Mr V. Ilievski, a lawyer practising in Skopje. 3.
61372619cd58014677422f07
13 mai 2003
trois, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller BLONDET et les observations de la société civile professionnelle PARMENTIER et DIDIER, avocat en la Cour ; Vu la communication faite
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0518JUD007155217
18 mai 2021
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623JUD002015915
23 juin 2020
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 4 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC003439105
13 décembre 2005
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0724JUD002561212
24 juillet 2018
    The Court’s assessment (a)     The relevant principles 34.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC004587909
24 mai 2016
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Inspection carried out by the Constanța Consumer Protection Agency 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0904JUD000014010
4 septembre 2014
    La peine principale à laquelle le requérant avait été condamné en Belgique arriva à son terme le 13 septembre 2011.
Page 152 sur 195
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.