CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56272
22 juillet 2003
regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Martins Serra and Andrade Câncio case delivered on 6 December 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56005
15 octobre 2001
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Perosino case delivered on 21 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-216971
25 mars 2022
The judgment became final on 24 June 2015.
ECLI:CEDH:001-56004
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Canzano case delivered on 21 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56001
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Palazzo case delivered on 17 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-55999
“the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Berrettari case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-69854
21 juin 2005
Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Loyen and others delivered on 29   April   2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56156
17 décembre 2002
the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Sousa Miranda case delivered on 30 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-68047
22 décembre 2004
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Jussy case delivered on 8   April   2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56009
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Piscopo case delivered on 21 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56178
24 février 2003
referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Conde case delivered on 23 March 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5100
3 octobre 2002
that he had already been prosecuted for the same facts, the court decided that the prosecution could not continue because there had already been a previous court decision, which in the meantime had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56176
the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fertiladour S.A. case delivered on 18 May 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56192
the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Bento da Mota delivered on 28 June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-141073
19 juin 2013
The second judgment became final on 28 June 2010.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD000025204
20 janvier 2009
That judgment became final on 27 May 2008. 3.     Attempts by the authorities to enforce the judgment 19.
ECLI:CEDH:001-56322
24 avril 2003
judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the six cases listed in the Appendix to this resolution, delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56319
final under Articles 44 and 46 of the Convention;   Recalling that the judgments of the Court became final on 29 June 2000 since, at this date, the government of the respondent state was informed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1221JUD003063306
21 décembre 2010
The judgment became final on 14 March 1996. 6.
PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-973291-1003866
7 avril 2004
As a result, he was deprived of any possibility of complying with the obligation to show where the coins had been at the time when the Act became operative.
Page 16 sur 1474