CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0902DEC001418003
2 septembre 2003
It is well established in the Court's case law that a defect at first instance may be remedied on appeal, so long as the appeal body has full jurisdiction.
Page 16 sur 29
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC005798600
14 décembre 2004
As this period had already expired, there was presently no official body entrusted with these powers in Slovakia.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC004626099
6 avril 2004
The applicant's son identified the body in the morgue. Meanwhile the gendarmes drafted an incident report and made a sketch map of the scene of the incident.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC001050802
31 mars 2005
Two members of the Supreme Court's panel that decided on the above-mentioned judgment, TH.K. and N.K., were also part of the decision-making body in the Supreme Court's judgment of 17 January 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0322DEC004670299
22 mars 2005
C.S. testified at the hearing that [the applicant] had been kicked and beaten by the police officers all over his body, on the face and on the head....Witness C.M. testified consistently that [the applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC005779300
16 mai 2006
Moreover, the complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC006151300
27 avril 2004
which circulated such statements is not capable of proving that these statements correspond to reality, the court shall compel the publishing office of the media body to publish, not later then 15 days
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0203JUD005814100
3 février 2005
) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Michael
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528DEC003377796
28 mai 2002
A party to the proceedings who sustained damage as a result of a failure of the administrative body to act in compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court given under Article
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC004582499
7 novembre 2000
complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that they were not heard by an independent and impartial tribunal, insofar as the decision to discharge them from the army was taken by an administrative body
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC003049496
19 juin 2001
Article 243 of the Turkish Criminal Code ( Türk Ceza Kanunu ) provides: “A President or member of a court or official body or any other public official who, in order to extract a confession of guilt in
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615DEC001393602
15 juin 2004
The Administration Council is a collegial and consultative administrative body of the Company.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002039092
10 juillet 1998
Mr Kevin McElduff, Mr Michael McElduff, Mr Paddy McElduff and Mr Barry McElduff, the remaining applicants (hereinafter “the McElduffs”), are all self-employed joiners based in Northern Ireland
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0523DEC003255596
23 mai 2002
, if the participant was not demonstrably sensitive to that test, the second part consisted of putting a drop of dilute mustard gas solution on protective clothing left in place on the participant’s body
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214DEC005526400
14 décembre 2000
The prosecutor concluded his reasoned decision as follows: “As for the injuries on the victim’s body described in the forensic medical certificate it should be stated that the skin abrasions on the right
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0128DEC002141302
28 janvier 2003
licence was revoked in violation of Article 6, it is not clear that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain is an organisation for which the State is responsible since is not a government body
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1207DEC003667297
7 décembre 2004
Upon his release, Mehmet Kurnaz was examined by a doctor whose medical report indicated that he had coloured lesions of various shapes and seizes and bruises on his body.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD003557497
He further complained that the court-martial was not “established by law” since an administrative body (the Admiralty Board) could quash his conviction and sentence. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC007031301
14 septembre 2004
The second set of proceedings As regards the later proceedings, the Government submit that the IAET is not a state authority and therefore any delays in the proceedings before this body were not attributable
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0301DEC007558301
1 mars 2005
In several separate decisions taken between August 2000 and March 2001 the District Court found that it had no jurisdiction to deal with the applicants' claims against the SIS and that the body