CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

579 résultats pour « Mickael BOUYRIE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0902DEC001418003

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2003

2 septembre 2003

It is well established in the Court's case law that a defect at first instance may be remedied on appeal, so long as the appeal body has full jurisdiction.

Page 16 sur 29

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1214DEC005798600

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2004

14 décembre 2004

As this period had already expired, there was presently no official body entrusted with these powers in Slovakia.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC004626099

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2004

6 avril 2004

The applicant's son identified the body in the morgue. Meanwhile the gendarmes drafted an incident report and made a sketch map of the scene of the incident.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0331DEC001050802

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2005

31 mars 2005

Two members of the Supreme Court's panel that decided on the above-mentioned judgment, TH.K. and N.K., were also part of the decision-making body in the Supreme Court's judgment of 17 January 2001.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0322DEC004670299

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2005

22 mars 2005

C.S. testified at the hearing that [the applicant] had been kicked and beaten by the police officers all over his body, on the face and on the head....Witness C.M. testified consistently that [the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0516DEC005779300

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2006

16 mai 2006

Moreover, the complaints intended to be made subsequently at Strasbourg should have been made to the appropriate domestic body, at least in substance and in compliance with the formal requirements and

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0427DEC006151300

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2004

27 avril 2004

which circulated such statements is not capable of proving that these statements correspond to reality, the court shall compel the publishing office of the media body to publish, not later then 15 days

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0203JUD005814100

Admin. suprême

3 février 2005

3 février 2005

) against the Republic of Austria lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Austrian national, Mr Michael

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528DEC003377796

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2002

28 mai 2002

  A party to the proceedings who sustained damage as a result of a failure of the administrative body to act in compliance with the judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court given under Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC004582499

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2000

7 novembre 2000

complain under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that they were not heard by an independent and impartial tribunal, insofar as the decision to discharge them from the army was taken by an administrative body

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC003049496

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

Article 243 of the Turkish Criminal Code ( Türk Ceza Kanunu ) provides: “A President or member of a court or official body or any other public official who, in order to extract a confession of guilt in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615DEC001393602

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2004

15 juin 2004

The Administration Council is a collegial and consultative administrative body of the Company.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002039092

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1998

10 juillet 1998

    Mr Kevin McElduff, Mr Michael McElduff, Mr Paddy McElduff and Mr Barry McElduff, the remaining applicants (hereinafter “the McElduffs”), are all self-employed joiners based in Northern Ireland

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0523DEC003255596

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2002

23 mai 2002

, if the participant was not demonstrably sensitive to that test, the second part consisted of putting a drop of dilute mustard gas solution on protective clothing left in place on the participant’s body

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1214DEC005526400

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2000

14 décembre 2000

The prosecutor concluded his reasoned decision as follows: “As for the injuries on the victim’s body described in the forensic medical certificate it should be stated that the skin abrasions on the right

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0128DEC002141302

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2003

28 janvier 2003

licence was revoked in violation of Article 6, it is not clear that the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain is an organisation for which the State is responsible since is not a government body

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1207DEC003667297

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 2004

7 décembre 2004

Upon his release, Mehmet Kurnaz was examined by a doctor whose medical report indicated that he had coloured lesions of various shapes and seizes and bruises on his body.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615JUD003557497

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2004

15 juin 2004

He further complained that the court-martial was not “established by law” since an administrative body (the Admiralty Board) could quash his conviction and sentence. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0914DEC007031301

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2004

14 septembre 2004

The second set of proceedings As regards the later proceedings, the Government submit that the IAET is not a state authority and therefore any delays in the proceedings before this body were not attributable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0301DEC007558301

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2005

1 mars 2005

In several separate decisions taken between August 2000 and March   2001 the District Court found that it had no jurisdiction to deal with the applicants' claims against the SIS and that the body

Source officielle