CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD004334905
6 avril 2010
on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts (see Jersild v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0406JUD002571104
The applicants, therefore, had had no right to reveal facts relating to B.'s private life. 16.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0109DEC002227593
9 janvier 1995
        The facts as submitted by the parties may be summarised as follows.   A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1016JUD000346609
16 octobre 2014
(b) The substantive aspect of Article 3 (i) Relevant principles 59.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD003755305
26 novembre 2013
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0926DEC000351402
26 septembre 2006
In order for a particular form of conduct to be punishable, it had to be conducive to causing damage or suffering.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1204REP002488894
4 décembre 1998
  ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FACTS   A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110JUD005845200
10 janvier 2008
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.     The first applicant was born in 1955 and lives in Dillenburg, a town situated in the Federal Republic of Germany.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD007321901
6 décembre 2007
The witnesses Mr V.S., Ms B.I. and Ms O.Ch. confirmed that fact.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0222JUD001889291
22 février 1996
  AS TO THE FACTS   I.       The circumstances of the case   6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0423JUD005262410
23 avril 2013
To this end they must examine all the facts arguing for or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of the presumption of innocence
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0114JUD005023113
14 janvier 2021
    An attempt to commit the offence under paragraph 1 of this Article shall also be punishable.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD000062114
19 mai 2022
THE FACTS 2.     The applicant was born in 1956 and lived in Gyöngyöspata. He was represented by Ms S. Kapronczay, a lawyer practising in Budapest. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD002345903
27 octobre 2009
Thus, exemption from compulsory military service on a ground not prescribed by law would have been in breach of the principle of equality and non-discrimination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD005882200
15 juin 2006
Regard being had ... to the relevant circumstances of the Shevanova case, and in particular the fact that Mrs Shevanova has lived and worked within Latvian territory for a long time – a fact which undoubtedly
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0708JUD006099900
8 juillet 2008
However, if the Court considered that military courts should not try civilians in peacetime since it was incompatible with the fair trial guarantees of Article 6 § 1, it ought to have ruled on that principle
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0208JUD003356611
8 février 2018
The national judicial authorities must examine all the facts when arguing for or against the existence of a genuine requirement of public interest justifying, with due regard to the principle of presumption
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0217DEC002597807
17 février 2009
despite the fact that it had been rendered in absentia .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0731JUD004002003
31 juillet 2012
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1968:0406DEC000313467
6 avril 1968
Whereas the particular facts of the various applications may be summarised as follows:   1.
Page 162 sur 195