CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306JUD005957708
6 mars 2012
    In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ... ... 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1114JUD000327610
14 novembre 2013
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1979 and lives in Odessa. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1021JUD001744404
21 octobre 2010
There are exceptions to this principle, but they must not infringe the rights of the defence.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0319DEC002917906
19 mars 2013
The Mayor had further failed to establish correctly the facts of the case and to inform all the parties concerned about his decision. 29.
cr
6079a8729ba5988459c4d4d2
5 octobre 2004
223-15-2 du Code pénal, 2, 3, 6 à 8, 427, 485, 512, 591 et 593 du Code de procédure pénale ; "en ce que l'arrêt attaqué a écarté le moyen tiré de la prescription de l'action publique concernant les faits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0409JUD002982313
9 avril 2015
Aggravated murder was punishable by up to twenty years’ imprisonment. 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1008JUD003601313
8 octobre 2024
    The facts of the case may be summarised as follows. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0214JUD005552500
14 février 2008
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1970 and lives in Lignon (in the Canton of Geneva). A.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0213JUD007438913
13 février 2018
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1983 and lives in Pogradec. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407
26 mars 2013
As far as the applicant was concerned, such a decision was in breach of the principle that criminal offences should be investigated promptly and that the perpetrator should receive a fair punishment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927JUD002903204
27 septembre 2011
The request was granted on 8 June 1998 by the Bucharest District Court, having in mind the best interests of the child and the fact that his mother “did not oppose the request”.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:1219DEC000260465
19 décembre 1967
Whereas the facts presented by the Parties and apparently not in dispute between them may be summarised as follows:   1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD000397605
20 janvier 2009
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.     The applicant was born in 1954 and lives in Gaziantep. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0719JUD000049709
19 juillet 2012
The fact that she had ended her life of her own accord before lodging an application could not result in an extension of the entitlement to lodge an application, having particular regard to the fact that
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0220JUD004386818
20 février 2024
The District Court found that the versions of the facts given by the applicant and by A. were both credible.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0606JUD000944110
6 juin 2017
    The Court’s assessment (a)     General principles 56.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1022JUD006951901
22 octobre 2009
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 6.     The applicant was born in 1962 and lives in Vladivostok. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0118JUD004323198
18 janvier 2005
THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 9.     The applicant was born in 1973 and lives in Sofia. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1103JUD002877005
3 novembre 2011
An application for a provisional residence visa is in principle assessed on the basis of the same criteria as a residence permit. 32.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1105JUD003170913
5 novembre 2015
In this connection the appellate court held that the first-instance court had correctly taken into account the fact that the applicant had been charged with a less serious criminal offence punishable by
Page 163 sur 195
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.