CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

2 715 résultats pour « Bekens JOSEPH »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403DEC001749109

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

The representative declared that the applicant had actually been forced by the prison authority to write request for withdrawal under threat of physical violence. 9.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3047377-3366274

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2010

2 mars 2010

Accordingly, the Court concluded that there had been a violation of Article 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC006190711

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

had been based on amounts of tax-deductible expenses that had been contested and had later turned out to be wrong.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215024

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2021

14 décembre 2021

    Has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in the present cases (see, inter alia , Amato Gauci v.   Malta , no.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2079099-2236214

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2007

6 septembre 2007

Had a vowel not been elided, it would automatically have been officially registered as a forename. Subsequently, the name cannot therefore be deemed unsuitable for a child.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2893423-3185838

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2009

16 octobre 2009

However, no provision for these transactions had been made in its books.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0122DEC002691604

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2008

22 janvier 2008

In respect of Mr Chitoroagă the doctor added that the injuries could not have been caused by a simple fall.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0830DEC002184304

Admin. suprême

30 août 2005

30 août 2005

damaged and parts had been removed whilst it had been parked up in the period from October 2000.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3168255-3520054

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2010

28 juin 2010

He further complained that the proceedings in the High Court of Cassation and Justice had not been conducted in public, that his appeal on points of law had been declared null and void and that the High

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1849493-1956218

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2006

30 novembre 2006

She alleged that she had fallen pregnant five times as a result, that one pregnancy had been terminated and that, of the babies born from the other four, three had been ritually murdered and one had been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0310DEC004394307

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2015

10 mars 2015

    The applicant complained under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 of the Convention that he had been convicted on the basis of transcripts of conversations between himself and P.C. which had been unlawfully

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-247806

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2025

26 novembre 2025

by the hospital about the incident indicated that she had been put in a body bag for “ethical reasons”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202767

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2020

24 mars 2020

Published on 28 May 2020   THIRD SECTION Application no. 49378/18 Greta BARTOLO PARNIS against Malta and 3 other applications (see list appended) The facts and complaints in these applications have been

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1202DEC003064903

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 2008

2 décembre 2008

In those cases the Government confirmed that Article 25 of the 2006 Act had been applied and acknowledged that the length of domestic proceedings in the applicants’ cases had been excessive.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC000855003

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

However, upon a complaint by the applicant, on 9 and 17   September 2009 a prosecutor informed him that criminal proceedings had been opened and the material had been sent for investigation to the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0602DEC003851005

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2009

2 juin 2009

Under the same Article, he complained that the proceedings and the outcome had been unfair and that the domestic courts had failed to assess the facts correctly and had not been impartial.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC002116708

Admin. suprême

18 mai 2010

18 mai 2010

to be “active”, such as would justify finding the applicant guilty of the criminal offence with which he had been charged.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0827DEC005267699

Admin. suprême

27 août 2002

27 août 2002

A letter of authority has not been submitted. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0116JUD000315821

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2024

16 janvier 2024

of the property having been rented out all throughout at such prices.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-447821-448557

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2001

20 novembre 2001

The applicant’s counsel did not request that the boy be heard in person by these courts as, allegedly, such a request would have been denied in accordance with established Swedish case-law.

Source officielle

Page 17 sur 136

← PrécédentSuivant →