CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

7 489 résultats pour « Buresen »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0507JUD004631199

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2002

7 mai 2002

The burden is on the defendant to prove the truth of the statement on the balance of probabilities. 2.     Legal aid 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015DEC001670119

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2024

15 octobre 2024

    The IQC then shifted the burden of proof to the applicant in relation to the assets mentioned in the report and gave him a deadline to respond and produce supporting documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0720JUD003759897

Admin. suprême

20 juillet 2004

20 juillet 2004

This in turn reduced the risk of individuals facing a serious debt burden. 32.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4854

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2003

10 juin 2003

Their tax burden was considerably heavier under the amended legislation. The applicants applied to their local Tax Rectification Boards, relying inter alia on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-165048

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2016

21 juin 2016

In exceptional cases, the court may modify the mode of restitution or refuse restitution altogether where it would impose an undue and unfair burden on one party and, accordingly, bring undue advantage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233939

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2024

3 mai 2024

  In particular, did the reversal of the burden of proof as to the lawful origin of the assets impose an excessive burden on the applicants?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1812

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2008

9 décembre 2008

The Court had to examine whether the time it had taken the authorities to restore the applicant’s land to him or pay him compensation had not placed a disproportionate and excessive burden on him.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-194914

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2019

5 juillet 2019

    As regards the Government’s burden of proof   (a)     have the domestic authorities discharged their burden of proof by providing a plausible or satisfactory and convincing

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208200

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2021

29 janvier 2021

under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, taken alone and in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention, that the obligation to tolerate hunting on their respective properties imposes a disproportionate burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221297

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 2022

28 octobre 2022

In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4932

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2003

8 avril 2003

The applicant complained of inequality of arms in that the burden of proof lay on her and she was unable to cross-examine the Auditor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-89124

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2008

8 octobre 2008

Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concerns a breach of the applicant’s right to respect for his property as he had to bear a disproportionate and excessive burden

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205608

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2020

28 septembre 2020

In particular, did that interference impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant?    

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-188113

Admin. suprême

8 novembre 2018

8 novembre 2018

Did such deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on him?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180253

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2017

20 décembre 2017

  In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v.   Italy , [GC], no.   22774/93, §   59, ECHR   1999-V)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231325

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2024

30 janvier 2024

    If so, was that interference in the public interest, in accordance with the conditions provided for by law and did it impose an excessive individual burden on the applicants, within the meaning

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230904

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2024

12 janvier 2024

In particular, did that seizure impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant company considering its length (see Łysak v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217839

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2022

10 mai 2022

In particular, did the obligation to pay such fees place an excessive burden on the applicant, or fundamentally interfere with her financial situation?  

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217874

Admin. suprême

11 mai 2022

11 mai 2022

In particular, did that deprivation impose an excessive individual burden on the applicant (see Immobiliare Saffi v. Italy , [GC], no. 22774/93, § 59, ECHR 1999-V; Polimerkonteyner, TOV v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231287

Admin. suprême

1 février 2024

1 février 2024

In particular, did the applicants have to bear “an individual and excessive burden” within the meaning of that provision as a result of such interference (see Lekić v. Slovenia   [GC], no.

Source officielle

Page 17 sur 375

← PrécédentSuivant →