The applicants complained principally of the inadequate conditions of detention during their transport.

The police officers used physical force and/or special means (handcuffs, rubber truncheons) during the applicants’ arrest.

During that interview SR reminded the applicant about the statement provided during the second interview, including her statement that she thought that the content of the packages was a product to be used

During the night of violence, more than 250 people were killed and more than 2,500 were injured. 5.

During the night of violence, more than 250 people were killed and more than 2,500   were injured. 5.

August 2011 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

O., during the criminal proceedings against her.

During his arrest, he was allegedly beaten and dragged by the police, even though his trousers had fallen off.

lodged on 23 November 2016 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant due to the fact that he was not assisted by a lawyer during

application concerns: firstly, the alleged lack of any genuine prospect of the applicant’s release in view of his life-imprisonment sentence; and, secondly, various restrictions on his right to family visits during

CIV. 2 MW2 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 23 octobre 2025 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant fonction de

CIV. 2 EO1 COUR DE CASSATION ______________________ Décision du 23 octobre 2025 Rejet non spécialement motivé Mme DURIN-KARSENTY, conseillère doyenne faisant fonction de

Turkey (dec.), no. 68953/01, 30 August 2005) and the number of changes in the composition of the trial court’s bench during the trial. QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.

There were breaks of between three and 70 days between the application of the punishment-cell regime during which the applicant was under normal prison regime.

June 2012 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during

the hearing before the Kyiv Pecherskyy District Court which lasted from about 9   p.m. on 22 March 2014 until 4.30 a.m. on 23 March 2014 and during which the applicant was allegedly held in a cage

Türkiye 18/12/2018 Failure to comply with procedural guarantees provided for in domestic law Lack of reasonable suspicion Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of hearing during the

The court remained silent about the applicant’s handcuffing during the pronouncement of the judgment.