CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0514DEC004326002
14 mai 2009
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0112JUD002251013
12 janvier 2017
Since then, Mr McNamara has introduced a great many factual and legal issues, which have been exhaustively examined over many hearings.” 40 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1216DEC002518502
16 décembre 2003
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0111JUD004038506
11 janvier 2011
To the extent that it may nevertheless have been acquiesced in, the damage may be mitigated.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0914DEC003322296
14 septembre 1999
    Everyone charged with a criminal offence has the following minimum rights: ...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0206JUD000268912
6 février 2014
Not every inmate was willing to help, which made a sensitive situation even more frustrating and embarrassing for him, since he suffered from enuresis and encopresis (bladder and bowel incontinence).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004342598
3 octobre 2002
    Everyone has the right to freedom of expression.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0322DEC002678119
22 mars 2022
    The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 3.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1021DEC002672719
21 octobre 2021
Emberland of the Attorney General’s Office (Civil Matters) as their Agent, assisted by Ms E. Sawkins Eikeland, attorney at the same office. 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0703JUD002178007
3 juillet 2012
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Aleksejeva v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019JUD007785012
19 octobre 2017
The applicant has been serving this sentence since 3 September 2000, with interruptions between 13 January 2003 and 13 January 2005; 31 May 2005 and 17 August 2005; and 13 May 2008 and 30   May 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1217JUD007354414
17 décembre 2020
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Mile Novaković v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD000562309
5 avril 2016
Russia (dec.), no. 33408/03, 6 May 2004).
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-111123
18 avril 2012
The risk that the execution of the court decision may become more complicated or even impossible is a basis to order provisional remedies (...)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0122JUD003576723
22 janvier 2026
It should also be pointed out that it may well suffice that the victim is humiliated in his or her own eyes, even if not in the eyes of others (see, among many other authorities, Bouyid v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0506DEC003519406
6 mai 2010
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1218JUD002495294
18 décembre 2002
However, it was only on 8 January 2002 that the Government brought the matter to the attention of the Court. 44.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD002990614
17 octobre 2023
It may be subject to editorial revision. In the case of Dimaksyan v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002289305
27 mai 2008
Interim measures may also be ordered (section 130 of the Act). 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC001249006
19 janvier 2010
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.     The substantive proceedings A.
Page 17 sur 31