23393/05, §§ 30 and 32, 13 March 2007; McKay v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 543/03, § 41, ECHR 2006; Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister v.

Indeed, that Article lays down not only the right to “trial within a reasonable time or release pending trial” but also provides that “release may be conditioned by guarantees to appear for trial” (see Jabłoński

Until conviction he must be presumed innocent, and the purpose of Article 5 § 3 is essentially to require his provisional release once his continuing detention ceases to be reasonable (see Jabłoński v.

or detained, the authorities have an obligation under Article   5 §   3 to consider alternative measures to ensure his or her appearance at the trial (see Sulaoja , cited above, § 64, and Jabłoński

  543/03, §   41, ECHR 2006-X; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v.

Estonia , no. 55939/00, § 64, 15   February 2005, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000).

.; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , 27 June 1968, §   4, Series   A no.   8).

  36, § 3; and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21 December 2000). 53.

.; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21 December 2000; and Neumeister   v. Austria , 27 June 1968, §   4, Series   A no.   8).

Slovenia, no. 29462/95, §§ 82-88, ECHR 2000-XII; Jabłoński v. Poland, no. 33492/96, §§ 91-94, 21 December 2000; and G.B. v. Switzerland, no. 27426/95, §§ 34-39, 30 November 2000).

  543/03, §   41, ECHR 2006-X; Jabłoński   v. Poland , no.   33492/96, §   83, 21   December 2000; and Neumeister   v.

requirement of a decision on the merits within a reasonable time has been met (see, for example, Abdoella v. the Netherlands , judgment of 25   November 1992, Series A no. 248-A, p. 17, §   24; Jabłoński

certain lapse of time, the persistence of a reasonable suspicion does not in itself justify the deprivation of liberty and the judicial authorities should give other grounds for continued detention (see Jabłoński

Estonia , no. 55939/00, § 64, 15   February 2005, and Jabłoński v. Poland , no. 33492/96, § 83, 21   December 2000).

xa0;   SECOND CHAMBER                                   Application No. 33492/96       Henryk Jabłoński

released or detained, the authorities have an obligation under Article   5 § 3 to consider alternative measures to ensure his or her appearance at the trial (see Sulaoja , cited above, § 64, and Jabłoński