On 4 September 1996, M. made a statement to a solicitor, who had attained a Stage 2 British Sign Language qualification.

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 79.

    The applicant complained under Article 10 of the Convention about unjustified interference with her right to freedom of expression. THE LAW 11.

Articles 3, 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention.

The number of staff working varies from 4 to 20.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 3 of the Convention about lack of appropriate medical assistance in detention.

4.     Did the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy for his complaints about conditions of detention, as required by Article   13 of the Convention? 5.

statements at different stages of the proceedings.

de son élaboration en violation des articles 430 et 945-1 du nouveau Code de procédure civile et l'article L. 272-2 du Code de l'organisation judiciaire ; Mais attendu que n'étant pas contesté que

The applicant complains under Article 7 of the Convention that he was convicted contrary to the law. 7.

, pursuant to Article   35 §§ 3 and 4 of the Convention. 29.

3 and 8 of the Convention. 4.

The Court has already found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention in respect of the applicant in Saygılı v. Turkey (no. 57916/00, 4 May 2006). QUESTIONS tO THE PARTIES 1.

  The applicant also invokes Article 6 of the Convention.

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT THE GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST TO STRIKE OUT THE APPLICATION UNDER ARTICLE 37 OF THE CONVENTION 4.

They invoke Article 2 of the Convention.

Article 62 provides that the conditions under which “appeals” may be made by staff members, former staff members or their legal successors are laid down in Article 4 of Annex IX. 21.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 63.

They relied on Article   3 of the Convention. 7.