application under Rule 41 of the Rules of Court, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicants, Ms Carmen Emilia Rojas Arenas and her children Mauricio Julian Aristizabal Rojas and Mayra Alejandra

However, the applicants have not sought compensation in a civil action against the State.

After one remittal, on 5 October 2005 the Restitution Commission dismissed their claim to have the property restored into their possession and awarded them compensation instead.

Such complaints could have led to the institution of disciplinary proceedings.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE [Localité 1] [1] [1] Expéditions délivrées le: à Me HABA Me MEUNIER ■ 9ème chambre 2ème section N° RG 24/06651 - N° Portalis 352J-W-B7I-C44OP N° MINUTE : Assignation

03197 APPELANTE : SARL CONFORT BOIS CONSTRUCTION représentée par son gérant en exercice, domicilié ès qualités au dit siège social Le BOURG NORD 33420 JUGAZAN représentée par Me Joséphine HAMMAR

express – by way of a unilateral declaration – their acknowledgment that the applicant was deprived of her liberty in breach of Article   5 §   1 (f) of the Convention and that she did not have

During their detention the applicants did not have any daily walks or access to a shower, they could not receive parcels with food from their relatives, did not have bed linen and were not allowed to be

  2.2, rejecting “the requests of citizens of Leova who work on the territory of [L.] and have business licences”.

    The applicants applied to the Supreme Court of Justice to have that judgment quashed.

  Alleging that fresh evidence showed that Mr Marino was not a reliable witness and that they should have been acquitted, the applicants sought leave to apply for a retrial.

It appears from the case-files that the applicants have not lodged actions for tortious liability before the domestic courts, or have failed to provide the Court with a final decision rendered by the competent

He further stated that he could not have been aware at the time that the chassis number of the vehicle had been forged. 11.

They are Zahari Alexandrov Stefanov’s de facto wife and mother.

Kingdom (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 29   September 2020 as a Committee composed of:   Krzysztof Wojtyczek, President ,   Linos-Alexandre

MILOSAVLJEVIĆ against Croatia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 4   November 2014 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre

The Court observes that these objections are identical to those raised in the case of Alexandrou v.

    The applicants are members of three families who have been living since 2011 in three villas in La Thuile (Valle D’Aosta).

    The Court notes that in application no. 41786/14 the applicants Dinu Chioreanu, Gheorghe Dobrotă, Dumitru Duminică, Ion Pantelimon, Rădulescu Răducan and Costică Vlad have not been parties