Art 41 • Just satisfaction • Art 37 § 1 • Striking out applications • Absence of intention to pursue application   STRASBOURG 6 April 2023   FINAL   06/07/2023   This judgment has become

    STRASBOURG 15 October 2024     FINAL   15/01/2025   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

No appeal was filed against the decision of 12   September 2012 and it became final on 5 October 2012. COMPLAINT 12.

This decision became final on 27   March 1998.

regard to the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the Smith and Grady case delivered on 27 September 1999 and 25 July 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once they had become

Pursuant to rehabilitation of offenders legislation her conviction will never become spent. The applicant wishes to join the army but is unable to do so as she has an unspent conviction.

The court held that the applicant’s claim for reimbursement of overpaid tax had become time-barred.

If an applicant first avails himself of a domestic remedy and only subsequently becomes (or should have become) aware of the circumstances which render that remedy ineffective, it might be appropriate

This judgment became binding on 25 September 2003 but was not fully enforced.

Moreover, they submitted that the applicant had only become a party to the proceedings as of 22   November 2004 when he began to be represented by a lawyer.

render the remedy ineffective, it is appropriate to take as the start of the six-month period the date when he first became aware or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Diana and Taiuti ) or the latest date on which it could have become final ( Ridi and Golino ) or proceedings still pending (the other cases).

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Diana and Taiuti ) or the latest date on which it could have become final ( Ridi and Golino ) or proceedings still pending (the other cases).

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Diana and Taiuti ) or the latest date on which it could have become final ( Ridi and Golino ) or proceedings still pending (the other cases).

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Türkiye iş Bankasi case delivered on 18 June 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Minnema case delivered on 8 March 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Németh case delivered on 13   January 2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become