Complaints   The applicant complains that his rights of access to court and to a fair hearing guaranteed under Article 6 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights have been violated

Moldova and Russia   A delegation of four judges of the European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) composed of Mr Georg Ress (German), Sir Nicolas Bratza (British), Mr Josep Casadevall (Andorran

Despite the fact that Mr Zubczewski’s wife had been economically dependant on him, the Court found that his situation could not be equated with that of a single person.

    The applicant, Mr Joseph Calleja, is a Maltese national, who was born in 1945 and lives in Qormi.

;     Application No. 17669/91                       by Richard Johannes Joseph

The criminal liability would have been engaged even if the driver had obeyed all the rules, but had proved to be insufficiently concentrated on driving and if it could have been shown that by paying better

    The applicants submitted that the deprivation of their possessions had not been carried out under the conditions provided for by law since it had been effected in violation of the guarantees

court had been ignored. 12.

    The applicants submitted that the deprivation of their possessions had not been carried out under the conditions provided for by law since it had been effected in violation of the guarantees

On 10 December he received a telex from the Palermo public prosecutor confirming the provenance of one of the banknotes which had been seized.

on whose behalf they had been elected (employers’ associations and trade unions).

after his birth, was unable to inherit from his father unlike children who did have such ties either because they were born in wedlock or had been recognised by their father.

  The applicant had been the owner of land in the municipality of Cǎtunele (Romania) which he had been obliged to transfer to the State in 1962.

On 30 April 2001 the same court allowed the applicant to recover his property because the seizure had been unlawful.

The Court takes note that following the settlements reached between the parties the matter has been resolved at the domestic level and that the applicants do not wish to pursue their applications.

examination of the present case, notably when examining the case-law of the Supreme Court of Justice of Moldova in the field of death by negligence, the Court became aware that the present matter had been

been present at the battalion barracks, but also that he had been “injured, with his head bandaged”.

They pointed out that while they had been deprived of their property it had been awarded to third parties to make commercial profits at their expense, and that there had thus been no public interest in

state of mind since he had been deprived of liberty. 15.

THE LAW The applicant claimed to have been a victim of a violation of Article 6 §   1 of the Convention in that he had been tried at first instance by a tribunal that was not “impartial”.