2011 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Erik

Mikhail Nikolayevich NOVIKOV against Russia The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 24   March 2051 as a Committee composed of:   Khanlar Hajiyev, President,   Erik

  In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in her application.

April 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Christos Rozakis, President,   Nina Vajić,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Dean Spielmann,   Sverre Erik

By letters submitted on various dates, the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make a declaration with a view to resolving the issue raised by the applications.

First Section), sitting on 23   September 2010 as a Chamber composed of:   Christos Rozakis, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Dean Spielmann,   Sverre Erik

In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list in accordance with Article 39 of the Convention.

2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Erik

  In the light of the above, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (c) of the Convention, the Court now considers that the applicant has lost interest in his application.

, a green winter scarf, a crate with 500 Croatian kunas inside it, a pair of green rubber gloves, a blue overcoat and a purple skirt.

    In the present case, the first communication by the applicant sent to the Court was a duly completed application form together with annexes.

    In line with the application of the above rules, the disbursement of the applicants’ pensions was accordingly suspended or reduced for the respective periods. 7.

  The application was lodged with the European Court of Human Rights on 29 September 2003 and declared partly admissible on 5 January 2006.

Lastly, a further ban on building had been imposed under the detailed development plan, again with a view to expropriation.

During the consultation held that day with medical staff, Ms Evans and her partner J were informed that they would each need to sign a form consenting to the treatment and that, in accordance with the

On 17 January 2006 the Chamber dealing with the case relinquished jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber in accordance with Article 30 [2] of the Convention.

In addition, all four cells were equipped with a water tap with hot and cold running water. Heating was provided during the winter season. 9 .

discrimination prohibited by Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No 1.

    There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests

This decision was filed with the registry only on 19   March 1997. It became final on 6 July 1997.