CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

914 résultats pour « Thierry NORMAND »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1026DEC000307903

Admin. suprême

26 octobre 2004

26 octobre 2004

Otherwise there is a danger of an arbitrary decision being made by the executive.

Source officielle

Page 18 sur 46

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0626DEC005373100

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2003

26 juin 2003

The offences listed in section 2(5) were already punishable by a maximum of life imprisonment and they include rape. 2.     Regina v. Offen, Regina v. McGilliard, Regina v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0927DEC001231004

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 2005

27 septembre 2005

There can be no doubts that the sentence of imprisonment was lawful under Albanian law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0214DEC003185607

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Akdivar and Others ,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1107JUD000184816

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2019

7 novembre 2019

The existence of the remedies must be sufficiently certain, in practice as well as in theory, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see Salman v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0331DEC003271504

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2009

31 mars 2009

Under those circumstances, they had applied the law erroneously.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103DEC000667406

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

They drew the Court’s attention to the fact that the Constitutional Court had already instituted constitutional proceedings in a comparable legal situation in 2002. Specifically, in case no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1015JUD003452910

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2013

15 octobre 2013

He said that they were, and told the police officers that there were two young children in the house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0325JUD003719307

Admin. suprême

25 mars 2010

25 mars 2010

The court refused to take into account the medical certificate presented by the applicant: even if it was dated 12 July 2005, there was no date after its reference number, as is normally the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0724JUD002999508

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2012

24 juillet 2012

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, among other authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130JUD004720306

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2010

30 novembre 2010

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (see, among other authorities

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0906DEC006437211

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2016

6 septembre 2016

In his view, though, there was no reason to consider him a danger to national security. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC001462808

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness (...).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113038

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2010

24 juillet 2010

    the windows shall be large enough to enable the prisoners to read or work by natural light in normal conditions and shall allow the entrance of fresh air except where there is an adequate

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD005252607

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1007DEC003657502

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2003

7 octobre 2003

  The third applicant On 17 December 2001 the Odessa Garrison Military Court found in favour of the third applicant and awarded him 5342.20 UAH, including 5291.20 UAH for unpaid allowances and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10777

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2015

7 juillet 2015

They were expelled from there on 26 September 2011 when the time-limit for enforcement of the orders to leave the country expired.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC002099813

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

The existence of such remedies must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness; it falls to the respondent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0830DEC005296211

Admin. suprême

30 août 2016

30 août 2016

The applicant further contended that there had been no domestic remedy whatsoever available to him. 27.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0124DEC006639909

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

In the Government’s view there existed no valid reason to claim compensation only before the Supreme Court.

Source officielle