Principal facts   The applicant, Alexandra Katrami, is a Greek national who was born in 1966 and lives in Loutra Edipsou (Greece).

Enfin et contrairement aux allégations des demandeurs, le HARAS DES VILLARDS étant un [Localité 31] de 5ème catégorie, n'a besoin d'aucune autorisation pour recevoir du public.

have recovered their property.

obtained a ruling upholding his right to have his case heard within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

Turning to the impugned proceedings, launched by an application to have a decision set aside, the number of applicants could have had no impact on the eventual outcome.

160.45pt; display:inline-block } .sA3D40E95 { width:52.56pt; display:inline-block } .sA8847899 { width:93.07pt; display:inline-block }     FOURTH SECTION DECISION Application no. 63963/19 Alexandru

Thus, the latter could have adopted any appropriate countermeasures and could have exercised his right of defence, following such communication. 47.

They have had to change their addresses several times and now have no legal documents attesting their actual residence.

not have offered him any just satisfaction. 19 .

2012 as a Chamber composed of:   Josep Casadevall, President,   Corneliu Bîrsan,   Alvina Gyulumyan,   Egbert Myjer,   Ineta Ziemele,   Luis López Guerra,   Linos-Alexandre

    The Court notes that the Government have contested the locus standi of several of the applicants in the present case.

       The applicant was married to A.A.; they have two daughters, born respectively on 16 June 1984 and on 16 June 1986, and a son, born on 4 June 1990.

QUESTIONS Have the applicants been subjected, in breach of Article   3 of the Convention, to inhuman or degrading treatment during their imprisonment in the different penitentiaries in Romania?

    The general principles of the Court’s case-law concerning the fairness of the pre-trial proceedings have been summarised in Stăvilă v. Romania , no.

margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 211 October 2017 Alexandru

All applicants have been released from prison.

    The Court notes that the Russian Government have not made any submissions as to the admissibility and merits of applications nos. 862/16 and 40836/15 and have not made any further submissions

However, even though the defendants have been using the flat at issue since 1972 and have paid the rent and utility bills for it, they cannot be regarded as holders of a protected tenancy of the flat since

others against Austria The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 7   April   2015 as a Committee composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Linos-Alexandre