CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56216
24 avril 2003
to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Zannouti case delivered on 31 July 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56235
17 juin 2003
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Goubert and Labbé delivered on 19 March 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56268
22 juillet 2003
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Magyar case delivered on 11   January 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56031
17 décembre 2001
Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the de Moucheron and others case delivered on 17 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56036
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Oldham case delivered on 26 September 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56293
20 octobre 2003
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Dacewicz case delivered on 2   July 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-67531
12 octobre 2004
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Šleževičius case delivered on 13 November 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-68039
22 décembre 2004
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the İğdeli case delivered on 20   June 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-69971
18 juillet 2005
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Dondarini case delivered on 6   July 2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-69977
to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Société Colas Est and others delivered on 16   April   2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-71164
26 octobre 2005
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Perry case delivered on 17   July   2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-155688
11 juin 2015
that the failure of the domestic competent authorities promptly to assess the possibility of reopening the criminal investigation into the death of the applicant once the European Court’s judgment became
ECLI:CEDH:001-56267
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Baischer case delivered on 20   December 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-55911
18 décembre 2000
the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Scuderi Angelo case delivered on 8 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56263
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Becker delivered on 26   September 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56262
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Josef Fischer delivered on 17 January 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-189941
15 janvier 2019
Following judicial reform in Ukraine, the Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal was established on 1 January 2005 and became functional on 2 April 2007.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9794
27 février 1992
End: date on which the last decision became final ( Diana and Taiuti ) or the latest date on which it could have become final ( Ridi and Golino ) or proceedings still pending (the other cases).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC003133806
25 janvier 2011
The applicant was a party to civil proceedings which were terminated before 1 January 2007, that is, before the 2006 Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay (“the 2006 Act”) became
ECLI:CEDH:001-56294
the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Eryk Kawka case delivered on 27 June 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
Page 19 sur 1474