AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181492
16 février 2018
16 février 2018
On 3 March 2014 an investigator from the Criminal Investigations Unit of the Nagorno Karabakh Police ordered that the applicant be brought in for questioning.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0922DEC002852405
22 septembre 2009
22 septembre 2009
1 of this section is not acceded to or the State Attorney’s Office and the party fail to negotiate an agreement within four months after the date on which the party filed its proposal, the party may bring
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-128009
7 octobre 2013
7 octobre 2013
He was informed that E.R. refused the Agency’s invitations to bring the child for a psychological evaluation.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167949
26 septembre 2016
26 septembre 2016
By the final decision taken on 02 June 2014 an investigator refused to bring criminal proceedings against the applicant.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1049
16 mars 2010
16 mars 2010
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law No. 128 March
Source officielleAUDIENCE CONTENTIEUX DU MARDI DELIBERES
69be7963cdc6046d476e618a
1 juillet 2025
1 juillet 2025
AUDIENCE CONTENTIEUX DU MARDI AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS JUGEMENT DU 01/07/2025 DEMANDEUR(S) : CAISSE D'EPARGNE DE MIDI PYRENEES [Adresse 1] REPRESENTANT(S) : SELARL OUTRE DROIT - Maître Christophe BRINGER
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625DEC002764213
25 juin 2024
25 juin 2024
xa0; 27642/13) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 11 March
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527DEC004409810
27 mai 2014
27 mai 2014
The same applies to the desire by Mr Shmidt to bring proceedings against the judges responsible. 20.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126686
2 septembre 2013
2 septembre 2013
On 17 March 2008 the second-instance Sofia Court of Appeal gave a judgment.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0930DEC005337099
30 septembre 2003
30 septembre 2003
On 23 March 1992 the applicant commenced divorce proceedings. In the action the applicant stated that he and his wife had had no sexual intercourse for five years.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC004073905
12 octobre 2010
12 octobre 2010
On 5 March 2002 the applicant instituted civil proceedings with the Celje District Court ( Okrožno sodišče v Celju ) seeking compensation for damage. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1114DEC002483105
14 novembre 2006
14 novembre 2006
Poland , no. 52495/99, judgment of 28 March 2006. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-636
13 janvier 2011
13 janvier 2011
The applicant was held in preventive detention until December 2003 and from March to September 2004. He was subsequently admitted to a psychiatric unit.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224179
17 mars 2023
17 mars 2023
Sweden [GC], no. 43611/11, § 114, 23 March 2016)?
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-431000-431592
16 octobre 2002
16 octobre 2002
The applicant was born on 23 March 1965 in Paris. Her mother, who requested that her identity remain confidential, formally abandoned her child to the Social Services Department.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC003021896
18 janvier 2000
18 janvier 2000
On 23 March 1995 the applicant was arrested. On 24 March 1995 she was transferred to prison.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0609DEC000260006
9 juin 2009
9 juin 2009
On 4 March 2004 the applicant was examined again by a forensic doctor who noted that there was no injuries on the applicant’s person other than those observed in the medical report of 3 March 2004.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-117460
18 février 2013
18 février 2013
Refusal to bring criminal proceedings of 9 June 2010 On 9 June 2010 L. decided that there was no reason to bring criminal proceedings against the police officers concerned.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-55528
15 mai 1992
15 mai 1992
to the Committee of Ministers; Recalling that the case originated in an application against the Netherlands lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 31 March
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0506DEC004791699
6 mai 2003
6 mai 2003
In March 1998 the results of this examination were produced.
Source officiellePage 19 sur 448