Stojiljković, a lawyer practising in Leskovac. The applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

  Gemalmaz, a lawyer practising in Istanbul. 4.     The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. 5.

  Ivanišević, a lawyer practising in Zagreb; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning property, family life, prohibition of discrimination and general prohibition of discrimination

    Dorothee von Arnim   Pauliine Koskelo   Deputy Registrar   President   Appendix List of applicants: No.

Malta, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Pauliine Koskelo , President ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Davor Derenčinović , judges

Antolić, a lawyer practising in Zagreb; the decision to give notice of the complaints under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 concerning non-enforcement of a final domestic

Malta, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Pauliine Koskelo , President ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Davor Derenčinović , judges

  Ellis, a lawyer practising in Valletta; the decision to give notice of the application to the Maltese Government (“the Government”), represented by their Agent, Dr   C.

Malta, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Pauliine Koskelo , President ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Davor Derenčinović , judges

Malta, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Pauliine Koskelo , President ,   Lorraine Schembri Orland,   Frédéric Krenc , judges , and

Mandac, a lawyer practising in Zagreb; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning legal certainty, no punishment without law and respect for private life to the Croatian Government (“the

Specifically, he sought HRK 5,000 for fear, HRK 3,000 for physical pain and HRK 10,000 for breach of his dignity. 5 .

The presiding judge stated that they had once again tried to contact the lawyers.

    At the hearing held on 18 October 2006, where both the applicant and his lawyer were present, the lawyer read out the defence arguments in response to the public prosecutor’s opinion ( esas

    In her appeal, the first applicant’s lawyer noted, among other things, that she was not given the assistance of a lawyer within three hours of being deprived of her liberty.

(FDSEA) de Vendée, l’EARL Le Dognon, l’EARL la Frogerie, l’EI Guillaud Manuel, la SCEA La Baunaie, la confédération générale de l’agriculture (CGA), l’EARL les Granges de l’Abi, l’EARL Le Versant du Lay

Kootz , Senior lawyer, Fedasil,   Advisers ; (b)     for the applicants Mrs   E. Néraudau , lawyer,   Counsel , Mr   L.

    The Supreme Court scheduled an appeal session for 10 and 11   April 2013, to which the applicant and his defence lawyer were summoned. 13.

On the same day, the Regional Court ordered him to submit an appeal prepared and signed by a lawyer, as required by the relevant procedural rules.