CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

914 résultats pour « Thierry NORMAND »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0207DEC006668814

Admin. suprême

7 février 2023

7 février 2023

22.87pt; display:inline-block } .s9A659E2E { width:118.41pt; display:inline-block } .s5D826FD4 { width:25.88pt; display:inline-block } .s1B61D60 { width:156.43pt; display:inline-block }     THIRD

Page 19 sur 46

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0430JUD005878515

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2026

30 avril 2026

    The Government accepted that there had been an interference with the applicant’s right to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0128DEC002621611

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2014

28 janvier 2014

They emphasised that the Act on Compensation for Excessive Duration of Judicial Proceedings had entered into force on 1 January 2010.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0601DEC002632395

Admin. suprême

1 juin 1999

1 juin 1999

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1003JUD002610713

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2017

3 octobre 2017

They submitted that on 10   October 2011 at about 1-2 p.m. they had established the [applicant’s] whereabouts and invited him for a talk.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC003323509

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

There is of course no dispute that they were together at all material times. (3) that the murders involved two people acting together in what the law calls a joint enterprise, of which more in a moment

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0328DEC002863295

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2000

28 mars 2000

They conduct the preliminary investigation and decide whether or not to prosecute.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0910DEC002065811

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2013

10 septembre 2013

He also found that there was no risk that she would again be tricked into prostitution or re-trafficked.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0831DEC003245796

Admin. suprême

31 août 2000

31 août 2000

Their house and fields were given to the village guards who had moved there from other villages. All the villagers were forced to leave the village because they refused to be village guards.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC007344610

Admin. suprême

25 août 2015

25 août 2015

They referred to a judgment of the Rzeszów Court of Appeal (case no. III AUa 338/12) concerning a   request for reopening of proceedings in a similar case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0825DEC001918610

Admin. suprême

25 août 2015

25 août 2015

They referred to a judgment of the Rzeszów Court of Appeal (case no. III AUa 338/12 ) concerning a request for reopening of proceedings in a similar case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0721JUD003394603

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2009

21 juillet 2009

They maintained that in the circumstances of his case section 25 of the 2006 Act, which concerns terminated proceedings, was not applicable, but the applicant should instead use the remedies normally available

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0715JUD000368106

Admin. suprême

15 juillet 2014

15 juillet 2014

The expression “Croat” is normally used (both as a noun and as an adjective) to refer to members of the ethnic group, regardless of their nationality; it is not to be confused with “Croatian”, which normally

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306JUD002747302

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2007

6 mars 2007

There has therefore been a violation of that provision. ... IV.     APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION 55.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC004141111

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

In the first place, they submitted that the application had been lodged out of time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0521JUD007075812

Admin. suprême

21 mai 2015

21 mai 2015

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness. 60.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0930DEC006958401

Admin. suprême

30 septembre 2004

30 septembre 2004

The existence of the remedies in question must be sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice, failing which they will lack the requisite accessibility and effectiveness.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0528DEC003377796

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2002

28 mai 2002

On 14 January 2000 the applicant sold his share in parcel No. 30 to third parties.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0619DEC003049496

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2001

19 juin 2001

They further claim that there exist no guarantees to safeguard their right to life in domestic law and that they were unlawfully and arbitrarily deprived of their liberty.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0702DEC002830895

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2002

2 juillet 2002

They also kicked and punched them.

Source officielle