As to the applicants, they were both retired servicemen of the Yugoslav army. When moving to Skopje, they had the flats which they had rented until then from the army exchanged for flats in Skopje.

La réclamation présentée par la SAS Le Flag a été rejetée par décision du 10 décembre 2020 puis du 3 mai 2021.

    Tesla further claimed that A. lived with his parents whose apartment was next door to the flat in question and that since both flats had the same address, he had mislead the Bratislava Local

rendu l'arrêt suivant : Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Reims, 25 mai 2010), que pour le financement d'un marché de travaux de génie civil conclu entre la société Entreprise de travaux publics Botta

Shortly afterwards the first applicant arrived at the flat. As soon as he entered the flat he was hit in the face by one of the officers and thrown to the ground.

Adjacent to their flat, at flat no. 50, lived a Mr James Curtis.

The applicant silently held a so-called Árpád -striped flag which could be regarded both as a historical symbol and as a symbol reminiscent of a former regime.

On both occasions they inspected the identity documents of the persons present in the corridor, but did not enter the flat.

flat, but only if both flats taken together satisfied the housing needs of such tenants and the members of their household (section 49(3) of the 1974 Housing Act and section 60(3) of the 1985   Housing

and conferring the title to the same flat to a third person. 2.

    The applicants are both owners of flats in residential buildings in Skopje which are connected to a district heating network operated by a private heat supplier.

The rights of both the allocation right holders (public bodies which nominally controlled the flats) and the occupancy right holders were regulated by law (the Housing Act 1984, which is still in force

As the Court had stressed in Siliadin , possible defects in the relevant proceedings and the decision‑making process had to amount to significant flaws in order to raise an issue under Article 4.

It appears that the flat at 26/2-37, Ulitsa Ordzhonikidze, Ufa, was originally owned by G. and G. Both of them died on 15   March 2010.

barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : E1216 COMPOSITION DE LA JURIDICTION Président : François PRADIER, 1er Vice-président, tenant l’audience des référés par délégation du Président du Tribunal, Greffier : Flavie

The Institute subsequently discovered that the applicant had sold her old flat in March 1998.

    The applicant lived with her parents in a flat in Zagreb. Her father had a protected tenancy of the flat. The flat was owned by the Ministry of Defence.

The applicant was born in 1972 and has been living in that flat ever since.

Both reports noted the poor condition of all three flats.

    The Court observes that the domestic courts established that both A. and the applicant were the grandchildren of M., the deceased tenant of the flat, and both had been registered as living