affinity” between Article 13 and Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (ibid., §   152), the same is necessarily true of the concept of “effective” remedy within the meaning of the second provision (see Mifsud

Law of 2010 amending the 2006 Act (“the 2010 Act”, published in Official Gazette no. 150 of 26 November 2010) Section 10 of this Act adds a new section 36-b, by which the Supreme Court must forward a copy

Mifsud Bonnici ,   Mr   D. Gotchev ,   Mr   P . Jambrek,   Mr   E. Levits ,   Mr   M. Voicu, and also of Mr H. Petzold, Registrar , and Mr P.J.

Mifsud Bonnici ,   Mr   D. Gotchev ,   Mr   P. Jambrek ,   Mr   P. Kūris ,   Mr   U. Lōhmus ,   Mr   E. Levits ,   Mr   V.

Mifsud Bonnici, Mr   B.   Repik, Mr   E. Levits and Mr   V. Toumanov (Article   43 in fine of the Convention and Rule   21 §   5).

Mifsud Bonnici ,   Mr   P. Jambrek ,   Mr   P. Kuris ,   Mr   U. Lohmus ,   and also of Mr H.

Mifsud Bonnici , Mr B. Repik , Mr E. Levits , and also of Mr H. Petzold , Registrar , and Mr P.J.

Mifsud Bonnici,   Mr   J. Makarczyk ,   Mr   P. Jambrek ,   Mr   K. Jungwiert ,   Mr   U. Lōhmus ,   Mr   E. Levits, and also of Mr H.

Mifsud Bonnici ,   Mr   J. Makarczyk ,   Mr   D. Gotchev ,   Mr   B. Repik ,   Mr   A. Philip , ad hoc judge , and also of Mr H.

I would therefore like to add the following explanation. The word ‘narcotics’ actually means agents used in surgical anaesthetics and in painkillers not used in surgery (for example, morphine).

Section 4(2) adds that such an application can be lodged with the Supreme Court by the President of the Republic, the Chancellor of Justice, a local council, or Parliament ( Riigikogu ). 23 .

Referring to the principles established above (see paragraph 46), the Court would add that the burden of proof in this regard lies with the Government and it is for the Government to submit any pertinent

Mifsud Bonnici ,   Mr   J. Makarczyk ,   Mr   P. Jambrek ,   Mr   K. Jungwiert , and also of Mr H.

Milford (2000] EWCA Crim 84); and R v. Betts and Hall ([2001] EWCA Crim 224).

On 18 December 2002 the Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Russia applied for supervisory review of the judgment of 17 April 2001, requesting a milder sentence.

The same is necessarily true of the concept of “effective” remedy within the meaning of Article 35 § 1 (see Mifsud v. France (dec.) [GC], no. 57220/00, ECHR 2002-VIII).

I would like to add that when I was arrested the police told me that they needed me to give a statement. They knew I was soft and that I would sign everything they asked just to get out.

  25803/94, §   76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v. France (dec.), no.   57220/00, §   15, ECHR   2002-VIII). 24.

    The Court reiterates that under Article 35   §   1 of the Convention, it may only deal with an application after all domestic remedies have been exhausted (see, for example, Mifsud

    On 5 April 2006 the first applicant was again questioned and stated that she had nothing to add to her previous declarations. 78.