CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1017JUD004370202
17 octobre 2006
  m. situated in the centre of Warsaw, at the junction of Jerusalem Avenue and Marszałkowska Street. The applicant is one of the heirs of the owners of that property. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006JUD002720903
6 octobre 2009
Turkey , no. 48176/99, §   24, 19 May 2005, and Jerusalem v.   Austria , no.   26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II). 33.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC002399606
On 12 July 1995 he was apprehended in Jerusalem but was apparently first questioned only in March   1996.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1011DEC007423201
11 octobre 2005
The requirement to prove the truth of a value judgment is impossible to fulfil and infringes freedom of opinion itself, which is a fundamental part of the right secured by Article 10 (see Jerusalem v.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504JUD003452097
4 mai 2006
Espagne , arrêt du 23 avril 1992, série A n o 236, pp. 22-23, § 42, et Jerusalem c. Autriche , n o 26958/95, §   36, CEDH 2001 ‑ II).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0627DEC002695895
27 juin 2000
width:261.17pt; display:inline-block } .sB4F95464 { width:19.58pt; display:inline-block } THIRD SECTION   DECISION   AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF   Application no. 26958/95 by Susanne JERUSALEM
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0424JUD000733306
24 avril 2007
Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 50, ECHR 1999-VII; Nikula v. Finland , no. 31611/96, § 54, ECHR 2002-II; and Elci and Others v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1219JUD001823502
19 décembre 2006
Turkey , no. 48176/99, §   24, 19 May 2005; Jerusalem v.   Austria , no.   26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II). 31.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0224JUD002380603
24 février 2009
Turkey , no. 48176/99, §   24, 19 May 2005, and Jerusalem v.   Austria , no.   26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II). 39.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0525DEC005759700
25 mai 2004
  28 ‑ 29, §   50; and Jerusalem v. Austria , no.   26958/95, §§   33-34, 27   February 2001).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202JUD000057104
2 février 2010
  236 and Jerusalem v. Austria , no. 26958/95, § 38, ECHR 2001 ‑ II).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1120JUD002870203
20 novembre 2007
Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas Bratza , President ,   Mr   J. Casadevall ,   Mr   K.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD003431596
26 février 2002
Jungwiert ,   Sir   Nicolas Bratza ,   Mr   K. Traja , judges , and   Mrs   S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016JUD003630503
16 octobre 2007
Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas Bratza, President,   Mr   J. Casadevall,   Mr   G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0212JUD001729404
12 février 2008
Moldova (no. 4), The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas Bratza, President,   Josep Casadevall,   Giovanni Bonello,   Kristaq
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124JUD002536705
24 novembre 2009
It reiterates that, in accordance with its case-law, the existence of facts can be demonstrated, whereas the truth of value-judgments is not susceptible of proof (see Jerusalem v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0226JUD002927195
Loucaides ,   Sir   Nicolas Bratza ,   Mrs   H.S. Greve ,   Mr   K. Traja ,   Mr   M. Ugrekhelidze , judges , and   Mrs S.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318JUD001560102
18 mars 2008
Turkey , no. 48176/99, §   24, 19   May 2005; and Jerusalem v.   Austria , no.   26958/95, § 43, ECHR 2001-II). 40.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0329JUD007595501
29 mars 2005
Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas Bratza , President ,   Mr   J. Casadevall ,   Mr   G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127JUD004286405
27 novembre 2007
Page 2 sur 3