Law – Article 8: (a) Secret surveillance – (i) Admissibility – The Court determined that the present complaint was not “substantially the same” as that examined in Association for European Integration

By two judgments of 11 April 2016 and 8 November 2016 the District Court also convicted individuals Fi. and Ma. of the same crime in respect of the same incident.

Further, it could not accept the argument that, since they lived in the same neighbourhood, the children were able to see each other, because maintaining family ties between them was too important to be

As the proceedings did not concern the same matter, there was no impediment to the examination of the charges.

Consequently, the tax imposed in 2004 had been EUR 108,851 too low and in 2005 EUR 117,036 too low. The tax imposed on the applicant had thus been in total EUR 225,887 too low. 12.

The applicant was accused of aggravated tax fraud as he had failed to declare his own income and, consequently, the tax imposed on him had been too low.

The undeclared income amounted to 33,000 euros for the tax year 2003 and, consequently, the tax imposed in 2003 had been 12,420 euros too low.

According to the protocol of detention that was drawn the same day at 6 pm. the applicant was arrested only at that hour.

The same applied for the tax years 2002 and 2003. The taxation decisions had all become final before the charge of aggravated tax fraud, which concerned the same matter, was pressed.

s testimony reads as follows: “One day my parents sent me to see Tomo Kovač [the applicant] to get cigarettes and our bicycle, which we had lent to Tomo. I went to Tomo's house.

Section 41 “In actions containing several claims of the same plaintiff against the same defendant which are based upon the same factual and legal backgrounds, the jurisdiction shall be determined according

The prosecutor and the victims (family members of the murdered persons) appealed in cassation arguing, in particular, that the sentence was too lenient.

of 30 October 2015, the Administrative Court declared the 1984 decision unlawful and found that, as a consequence of granting A.G.’s main claim, the claims deriving from the main one had to be granted too

Relying in particular on Article   5   §   4 (right to liberty and security), he complained that it had taken the domestic courts too long to review the lawfulness of his detention.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête et un mémoire en production de pièces complémentaires, enregistrés les 3 juin et 3 août 2022, Mme H D, représentée par Me Samb Tosco, demande au tribunal :

pillows and the bed linen with the soap provided for their personal hygiene; (iii)   the detainees only have access to the shower area twice a week for 15   minutes, and the shower room is too

Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Interpretation of a rule on lodging of appeals on points of law, resulting in rejection as inadmissible of an appeal declared admissible by the same

Stoyanov KOLEV against Bulgaria lodged on 8 June 2011 STATEMENT OF FACTS The applicant, Mr Todor Stoyanov Kolev, is a Bulgarian national, who was born in 1959 and lives in Veliko Tarnovo.

On the same day the applicant’s lawyer was allowed to represent him.

The second applicant was alleged to have declared that he was acting Head of the Law Department at a State university whereas he had been transferred to a post of professor in the same department.