CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

39 résultats pour « TULOUP Me SINELLE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0111JUD000194804

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2007

11 janvier 2007

Tuulo Nuh was controlled by the Abgal clan of the Hawiye clan-family.

Source officielle

Page 2 sur 2

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1023DEC003271296

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1997

23 octobre 1997

In June 1984 C began to have epileptic fits caused by a brain tumour and the press became aware of C's condition in August 1986.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0204DEC000585418

Admin. suprême

4 février 2025

4 février 2025

    The applicant in application no. 5854/18, Mr Mikko Juhani Tulokas (the first applicant), was a Finnish national, who was born in 1946 and lived in Helsinki.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216DEC005128218

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

in all likelihood fatally metastasised before Dr D. had seen it on 19   April 2002, (ii) the chances of survival in that case were estimated at 5%, and (iii) the removal of such an aggressive tumour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627JUD001747218

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2024

27 juin 2024

    Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment. JURISDICTION 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0706DEC004229698

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1999

6 juillet 1999

He developed numerous tumours in his throat and suffered from high blood pressure, high cholesterol and thyroid problems.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1028JUD002678095

Admin. suprême

28 octobre 1999

28 octobre 1999

have given way to a Renault Fuego being driven by M., who was coming from the right out of the rue de la Tulipe and heading towards the Porte de Namur.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1113JUD004110810

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

She required surgery for an abdominal tumour. Dr   V.B. assumed charge of her treatment. 7.     Dr.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410JUD000633905

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2007

10 avril 2007

    On 10 October 2001 the applicant and J. were informed, during an appointment at the clinic, that preliminary tests had revealed that the applicant had serious pre-cancerous tumours in both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0130JUD003888497

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2003

30 janvier 2003

A copy of a medical certificate was also produced, indicating that the applicant was suffering from a tumour to his right hand which was reappearing despite two surgical operations for its removal. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1106JUD007328101

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2008

6 novembre 2008

It noted the medical experts' opinion that the applicant might have developed a tumour of the salivary gland and decided that he would have greater freedom to choose the medical treatment he wished to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1209JUD001696606

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2010

9 décembre 2010

he was suffering from a number of ailments, such as diffuse atherosclerosis of the cerebral arteries, circulatory encephalopathy, hypotonia, chronic pancreatitis, a duodenal ulcer, and a pancreatic tumour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206JUD002208804

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2007

6 décembre 2007

In 1996 he was diagnosed with a perianal tumour but refused further surgery. Due to a severe problem with his eyes, the doctors who examined the applicant recommended his release. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD000198806

Admin. suprême

18 février 2020

18 février 2020

The applicants submitted evidence of a single transaction with shares of “Gemenii” S.A. in 2015, when each share was sold for MDL 17.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003408105

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

As a result of the assault she had cracked a dental plate and had a swelling or tumour on her back.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD001246305

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

Without presenting any documents, she claimed that in 2008 she had been diagnosed with a benign tumour, which she thought was a result of the endured stress. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0206JUD000268912

Admin. suprême

6 février 2014

6 février 2014

The applicant’s single-tier bed was installed by a wall in the corner near the window.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD007491201

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2009

17 septembre 2009

The 1994 decree imposed the following restrictions: –     restrictions on visits by family members (a maximum of a single one ‑ hour visit per month); –     no meetings with

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1008JUD002156613

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2015

8 octobre 2015

relevant: “6.2.1 Penile biopsy There is no need for biopsy if: •   there is no doubt about the diagnosis and/or •   treatment of the lymph nodes is postponed after treatment of the primary tumour

Source officielle