Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Fernandes Magro case delivered on 29 February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Entleitner case delivered on 1 August 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mauer case delivered on 20 June 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kuopila case delivered on 27 April 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Diana and Taiuti ) or the latest date on which it could have become final ( Ridi and Golino ) or proceedings still pending (the other cases).

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Thaler case delivered on the 3   February 2005 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Marques Gomes Galo case delivered on 23 November 1999 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Rodrigues Carolino case delivered on 11 January 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

“the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Nunes Violante case delivered on 8 June 1999 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mills case delivered on 5 June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Kern case delivered on 24   February   2005 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

During the proceedings, Ö.A. passed away and his heirs, the applicants, became parties to the case.

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

In the instant case, the applicant became “substantially affected” when he was arrested in the Netherlands in October 1996.

End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings

and directed the Government to take all appropriate measures to secure non-discriminatory payment of the per diems to all those entitled, within six months from the date on which the Court’s judgment became

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the P.B. case delivered on 1 August 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become