Délibéré après l'audience du 26 juin 2025, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Rolin, présidente, Mme Topsi, conseillère, Mme Lebel, conseillère.

Délibéré après l'audience du 26 juin 2025, à laquelle siégeaient : Mme Rolin, présidente, Mme Topsi, conseillère, Mme Lebel, conseillère.

Le rapport de Mme Lebel a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique, les parties n’étant ni présentes, ni représentées. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

Le rapport de Mme Lebel a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique les parties n’étant ni présentes, ni représentées. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

Le rapport de Mme Lebel a été entendu au cours de l’audience publique, les parties n’étant ni présentes, ni représentées. Considérant ce qui suit : M.

Meanwhile, a bacteriological analysis of water from the applicant’s well in 2008 showed that the index of E. coli bacteria far exceeded the level permitted by law.

quatre vingt quatorze, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le rapport de M. le conseiller ROMAN et les conclusions de M. l'avocat général DINTILHAC ; Statuant sur le pourvoi formé par : - DEL ROSARIO Léonel

of jurisdiction   4 months and 25 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   2 years, 9 months and 2 days 3 levels of jurisdiction   0     9017/07 08/02/2007 Oleksandr Terentiyovych PALAMARCHUK

of jurisdiction   9 years, 8 months and 7 days 2 levels of jurisdiction   11 years, 3 months and 3 days 3 levels of jurisdiction 3,000     35124/11 23/05/2011 Sergiy Mykolayovych Doroshenko

    16/11/2009   23/03/2007     08/08/2016   10 days 2 levels of jurisdiction   6 years, 8 months and 24 days 2 levels of jurisdiction   1,800     21165

of jurisdiction 1,800     35763/08 01/08/2007 Svitlana Mykhaylivna Gasyak 11/09/1976     28/02/2007   20/06/2013   6 years, 3 months and 24 days 3 levels of jurisdiction

of jurisdiction 23 July 2007 1,080 € 294.69 € 1,374.69 € 2 18798/04 Nikola JORDAN 11 May 2004 25 June 2000 19 January 2007 six years and seven months at one level of jurisdiction 15 January 2008 2,160

Therefore the length of the proceedings (5 years, 9 months, 1   day and 5 years, 9 months, 10 days, respectively, before 3 levels of jurisdiction) was not excessive or unreasonable (see, Yuryeva and

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Mr Lemel (Application no. 27988/03, lodged on 1 December 2003) The applicant, Mr Nathan Lemel, is a British national who was born on 24 June 1929 and lives in London.

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth / Date of registration Representative name and location Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction Domestic court file

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.