CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Cour d'Appel
6253c8f9bd3db21cbdd86dbf
28 janvier 2004
Raymond et de MEGEVAND Madeleine, de nationalité française, marié, gérant de société, demeurant 495 route de Vovray 74160 COLLONGES SOUS SALEVE Prévenu, intimé, libre, comparant Assisté de Maître BEUCHER
Page 20 sur 167
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5653
7 juin 2001
did not guarantee the right to disclosure, before the hearing, of submissions which had not been disclosed to the other party to the proceedings or to the reporting judge or to the judges of the trial bench
ECLI:CEDH:002-11925
12 avril 2018
The amendment was applied in the criminal proceedings against the second applicant with regard to the offence of theft of FOZZ’s property.
civ1
61372380cd5801467740aa5f
3 mai 2000
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la Banque populaire de Bretagne Atlantique, dont le siège est 12, Cours
6ème chambre - formation à 3
DCA_20MA02349_20230109
9 janvier 2023
Renaud Thielé, rapporteur, - les conclusions de M.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1025JUD002225113
25 octobre 2016
The trial bench heard several witnesses and an expert witness and examined the reports in the case file. 15.
civ3
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C310510
21 décembre 2017
Pourvoi n° F 16-26.703 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E _________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIÈME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-126679
3 septembre 2013
As regards the findings of the Supreme Court on 3 November 2010, the District Court stated that they were binding on the bench re-hearing the case and not on a court hearing a separate request for release
comm
613723f8cd5801467741092f
12 février 2002
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE, FINANCIERE ET ECONOMIQUE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1217DEC006029313
17 décembre 2019
The bank had agreed to cancel the mortgage only after the company had repaid the loan taken out for the purpose of implementing the building project. 13 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002243993
15 mai 1996
His detention on remand from 6 February onwards was counted towards this sentence. On 6 June 1989 he was again taken into detention on remand.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0916DEC003539204
16 septembre 2008
On the same day, the investigating judge ordered the applicants’ detention on remand.
Tribunal Administratif de MELUN
DTA_2603688_20260422
22 avril 2026
B..., représentée par Me Bettach, demande au juge des référés, statuant sur le fondement de l’article L. 521-1 du code de justice administrative : 1°) d’ordonner la suspension de l’exécution, jusqu
ECLI:CEDH:001-218727
7 juillet 2022
SK 24/18) on 24 March 2021 in a bench composed of judges J.W., J.Pi., J.P., W.S. and M.W.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0117DEC002635295
17 janvier 1997
Having regard to the application introduced on 3 January 1995 by G.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0601DEC003050096
1 juin 1999
Fribergh, Section Registrar ; Having regard to Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms; Having regard to the application introduced
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0623DEC006531313
23 juin 2020
Article 180 §§ 1 and 2 of the Constitution reads as follows: “1. Judges shall not be removable. 2.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2018:C301007
15 novembre 2018
Pourvoi n° K 17-14.498 R É P U B L I Q U E F R A N Ç A I S E _________________________ AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANÇAIS _________________________ LA COUR DE CASSATION, TROISIÈME CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1202DEC003967898
2 décembre 2003
Early , Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged with the European Commission of Human Rights on 9 January 1998, Having regard to Article 5 § 2 of Protocol No. 11 to the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0115JUD006895511
15 janvier 2015
As regards the lack of impartiality of the trial bench, the Constitutional Court observed: “In the case in issue, the mere fact that the president of the trial bench had on three previous occasions ...