CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0528JUD000141305
28 mai 2014
The Government observed that if the Court had had any doubts it should have contacted them again and should have repeated its request for the documents. 10.
Page 21 sur 100
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0226JUD001339687
26 février 1993
Mr Alessandro Padovani is a workman and lives in Bergamo. On 21 February 1987 he was arrested by the police, who had found certain items of stolen property in his possession.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326DEC003928222
26 mars 2024
The Court notes that the general principles on excessive length of proceedings and domestic remedies have been outlined in Olivieri and Others v.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-183958
22 mai 2018
(b) Did the applicant have an effective and enforceable right to compensation for house arrest in alleged contravention of Article 5 § 3, as required by Article 5 § 5 of the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD003492207
19 janvier 2010
(no. 34922/07) against Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Serbian nationals, Ms Aleksandra
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331DEC001373108
31 mars 2015
It appears that the judgments in the applicant’s favour have not been enforced. 2. Proceedings against the bailiffs’ service 11.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1105JUD003320320
5 novembre 2024
It further observed that the applicant could have informed the public about the hearing at issue without showing images and sound thereof, finding that retelling it would have efficiently fulfilled her
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC001242410
18 septembre 2012
The Government pointed out that the applicant should have lodged a further complaint about the length of proceedings to the competent authority. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD005224612
30 avril 2015
Article 13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in the Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority ...” 22.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD003543005
4 avril 2013
The Court will therefore have to study other means of redress. B. Pecuniary damage 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0830DEC003536505
30 août 2011
It further notes that the applicant does not appear to have ever substantiated his claim against the usher, and in particular, to have adduced any evidence to demonstrate that the latter applied any unlawful
3e Chambre B
6032e6aaebff3d5abd1f89c0
9 novembre 2017
] [Z] épouse [K] [OO] [XX] [Y] [QQ] [T] épouse [Y] [FF] [UU] [NN] [PP] épouse [UU] [SS] [BB] [JJ] [DD] épouse [BB] [B] [ZZ] [VV] [TT] [U], [PP], [B] [H] [W], [N], [Y] [J] SCI BELVEDERE DU HARAS
ECLI:CEDH:001-222716
14 décembre 2022
If so, did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 § 1 of the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD001572205
9 octobre 2012
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President, Anatoly Kovler, Erik Møse, judges, and André
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC002023018
25 août 2022
Article 13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed
Pôle 4 - Chambre 9 - B
635236e58c924eadffcc48de
20 octobre 2022
PARTIE INTERVENANTE [11] venant aux droits du [14] non comparante représentée par Me Denis HUBERT -AARPI KADRAN AVOCATS - avocat au barreau de Paris, toque : K0154 substitué par Me BELLAHCENE Hajar
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC005116610
4 juin 2013
As regards their Article 14 complaint, the applicants could have brought a claim under the Prevention of Discrimination Act, by which they would have been able to seek an acknowledgment of
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140874
3 juillet 2013
provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2013)55 ); Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have
1ère chambre
6973683dcdc6046d4769fa4c
8 janvier 2026
COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Mme Isabelle Defarge, présidente de chambre Mme Alexandra Berger, conseillère Mme Audrey Gentilini, conseillère GREFFIER : Mme Ellen Drône, greffière
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD002202303
12 octobre 2021
a decisive influence and which, when a judgment was delivered, was unknown to the Court and could not reasonably have been known to that party, request the Court ... to revise that judgment. ...” 9.