CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0528JUD000141305

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2014

28 mai 2014

The Government observed that if the Court had had any doubts it should have contacted them again and should have repeated its request for the documents. 10.

Source officielle

Page 21 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0226JUD001339687

Admin. suprême

26 février 1993

26 février 1993

Mr Alessandro Padovani is a workman and lives in Bergamo. On 21 February 1987 he was arrested by the police, who had found certain items of stolen property in his possession.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0326DEC003928222

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2024

26 mars 2024

    The Court notes that the general principles on excessive length of proceedings and domestic remedies have been outlined in Olivieri   and   Others v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-183958

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2018

22 mai 2018

(b)     Did the applicant have an effective and enforceable right to compensation for house arrest in alleged contravention of Article 5 § 3, as required by Article 5 § 5 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119JUD003492207

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

(no. 34922/07) against Serbia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by two Serbian nationals, Ms Aleksandra

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0331DEC001373108

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2015

31 mars 2015

    It appears that the judgments in the applicant’s favour have not been enforced. 2.     Proceedings against the bailiffs’ service 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1105JUD003320320

Admin. suprême

5 novembre 2024

5 novembre 2024

It further observed that the applicant could have informed the public about the hearing at issue without showing images and sound thereof, finding that retelling it would have efficiently fulfilled her

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918DEC001242410

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2012

18 septembre 2012

The Government pointed out that the applicant should have lodged a further complaint about the length of proceedings to the competent authority. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0430JUD005224612

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2015

30 avril 2015

Article 13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in the Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority ...” 22.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0404JUD003543005

Admin. suprême

4 avril 2013

4 avril 2013

    The Court will therefore have to study other means of redress. B.     Pecuniary damage 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0830DEC003536505

Admin. suprême

30 août 2011

30 août 2011

It further notes that the applicant does not appear to have ever substantiated his claim against the usher, and in particular, to have adduced any evidence to demonstrate that the latter applied any unlawful

Source officielle
CA

3e Chambre B

6032e6aaebff3d5abd1f89c0

Appel

9 novembre 2017

9 novembre 2017

] [Z] épouse [K] [OO] [XX] [Y] [QQ] [T] épouse [Y] [FF] [UU] [NN] [PP] épouse [UU] [SS] [BB] [JJ] [DD] épouse [BB] [B] [ZZ] [VV] [TT] [U], [PP], [B] [H] [W], [N], [Y] [J] SCI BELVEDERE DU HARAS

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-222716

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2022

14 décembre 2022

    If so, did the applicants have a fair hearing in the determination of their civil rights and obligations, in accordance with Article 6 §   1 of the Convention?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009JUD001572205

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Erik Møse, judges, and André

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC002023018

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

Article 13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been committed

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 4 - Chambre 9 - B

635236e58c924eadffcc48de

Appel

20 octobre 2022

20 octobre 2022

PARTIE INTERVENANTE [11] venant aux droits du [14] non comparante représentée par Me Denis HUBERT -AARPI KADRAN AVOCATS - avocat au barreau de Paris, toque : K0154 substitué par Me BELLAHCENE Hajar

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0604DEC005116610

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2013

4 juin 2013

    As regards their Article 14 complaint, the applicants could have brought a claim under the Prevention of Discrimination Act, by which they would have been able to seek an acknowledgment of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140874

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2013

3 juillet 2013

provided regarding the payment of the just satisfaction awarded by the Court (see document DH-DD(2013)55 );   Having satisfied itself that all the measures required by Article 46, paragraph 1, have

Source officielle
CA

1ère chambre

6973683dcdc6046d4769fa4c

Appel

8 janvier 2026

8 janvier 2026

COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Mme Isabelle Defarge, présidente de chambre Mme Alexandra Berger, conseillère Mme Audrey Gentilini, conseillère GREFFIER : Mme Ellen Drône, greffière

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1012JUD002202303

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2021

12 octobre 2021

a decisive influence and which, when a judgment was delivered, was unknown to the Court and could not reasonably have been known to that party, request the Court ... to revise that judgment. ...” 9.

Source officielle