CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9792
27 février 1992
End: date on which the last decision became final ( Diana and Taiuti ) or the latest date on which it could have become final ( Ridi and Golino ) or proceedings still pending (the other cases).
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-68041
22 décembre 2004
Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Ramazanoğlu case delivered on 10 June 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0517DEC000368313
17 mai 2016
Russia (nos. 29920/05 and 10 others, 1 July 2014), the respondent State must, inter alia , grant adequate and sufficient redress, within two years from the date on which the judgment becomes final, to
ECLI:CEDH:002-9788
ECLI:CEDH:002-9803
End: date on which the last decision became final ( Ruotolo , Caffè Roversi S.p.a. , Gana and Barbagallo ) or latest date on which it could have become final ( Maciariello and Cappello ) or proceedings
ECLI:CEDH:002-9782
ECLI:CEDH:001-56215
24 avril 2003
as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Richet case delivered on 13 February 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:001-56180
24 février 2003
the European Court of Human Rights in the Limited Liability Company « Sotiris and Nikos Koutras ATTEE » case delivered on 16 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become
ECLI:CEDH:002-3233
27 juin 2006
The applicant became aware of the announcement on the Internet when he received an answer from a man, offering to meet up with him.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9813
ECLI:CEDH:002-9796
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-122221
3 juin 2013
Subsequently it became clear that the 2007 case did not affect the applicant’s constitutional complaint as it posed no problem of retroactivity.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1213DEC002844816
13 décembre 2016
aware or should have become aware of the violation of his or her rights or interests by the impugned court decision. 23.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2592989-2814542
22 décembre 2008
The judgment was upheld on appeal and became final. On 12   November 2007 the bankruptcy proceedings were terminated and the company ceased to exist.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0316JUD002139208
16 mars 2021
Lawsuit which became devoid of purpose 71.     In one set of proceedings (case   no.
CJUE
ECLI:EU:C:2002:246
23 avril 2002
#Boehringer Ingelheim KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG, Glaxo Group Ltd, The Wellcome Foundation Ltd, SmithKline Beecham plc, Beecham Group plc, SmithKline & French Laboratories Ltd en Eli Lilly and
ECLI:CEDH:001-179690
1 décembre 2017
The limitation period is counted from the date the person became aware of a violation of his or her rights.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504DEC001692603
4 mai 2006
If no objection is filed within the period fixed for that purpose, the penal order shall become final and enforceable.”
ECLI:CEDH:002-6262
15 novembre 2001
Between the fall of the Berlin wall on 9   November 1990 and German reunification, which became effective on 3   October   1990, Mr Honecker and Mr Axen had requested the conversion into
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1236254-1302862
27 janvier 2005
If no such question or issue arises, the panel will reject the request, at which point the judgment becomes final.
Page 21 sur 1474