AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC003281607
10 janvier 2012
10 janvier 2012
title to the land of that park had been issued.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC003317608
4 janvier 2012
4 janvier 2012
There had been several increases in permissible rent levels and other measures had been taken with a view to resolving the issue. 28.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC004421807
4 janvier 2012
4 janvier 2012
In respect of the two bigger flats the regulated rent has been EUR 84 a month. 13.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC000263110
14 décembre 2010
14 décembre 2010
of the director of the SAB nor that of the Prosecutor General had been adequately motivated.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0930JUD001027704
30 septembre 2008
30 septembre 2008
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; 3.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC003728105
14 septembre 2010
14 septembre 2010
rather than that the applicant had been wrongly considered a suspect.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231660
22 février 2024
22 février 2024
Has there been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention (see, for example, Carmelina Micallef v. Malta, no.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1130DEC000503202
30 novembre 2010
30 novembre 2010
persons that had participated or been present had been listed and signed the record, the presence of dogs had not been noted and the second applicant’s obstruction had also not been noted) it had been
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0517JUD002115104
17 mai 2011
17 mai 2011
The applicant company also claimed EUR 100,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and argued that the company and its managers had been under severe pressure and had been subjected to endless searches
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0118JUD003139105
18 janvier 2011
18 janvier 2011
Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention; 3. Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention; 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0929DEC000816306
29 septembre 2009
29 septembre 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC000358306
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1120DEC004588706
20 novembre 2012
20 novembre 2012
45887/06) complained that his pre-trial detention had been unlawful and had not been based on sufficient evidence.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616DEC000028905
16 juin 2009
16 juin 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC000321506
20 octobre 2009
20 octobre 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0519DEC002067405
19 mai 2009
19 mai 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0616DEC000137105
16 juin 2009
16 juin 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC002252308
18 mai 2010
18 mai 2010
under the review of the trial court and has thus been reviewed within the applicable time-limit after the decision appealed against.”
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1124DEC000322406
24 novembre 2009
24 novembre 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0630DEC001208005
30 juin 2009
30 juin 2009
COMPLAINTS The applicants complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that the civil proceedings had been excessively long.
Source officiellePage 21 sur 136