CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 457 résultats pour « Flavie Botti »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0311JUD006039100

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2004

11 mars 2004

    Her grandmother was the owner of a flat in Livorno, which she had let to I.B.C. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0505JUD004591115

Admin. suprême

5 mai 2026

5 mai 2026

    On 9 March 2015 both applicants, along with around 50   other participants, took part in the demonstration.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0531JUD006973511

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

the flat at issue.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0527JUD006383300

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2004

27 mai 2004

    He is the owner of a flat in Florence, which he had let to L.B. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0911DEC004001698

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2001

11 septembre 2001

From 1989 the applicant lived with Mr W. in a flat in Vienna, which the latter had rented a year earlier. Both being homosexual, they lived together and shared the expenses of the flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6968

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2000

2 mai 2000

heroin addicts, were charged with supplying heroin after various sachets of heroin were found in their flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC003183819

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

2000 (hereinafter “the second flat”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0528DEC001471704

Admin. suprême

28 mai 2013

28 mai 2013

the flats.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD002885206

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

The applicant and his family members brought proceedings against both the unitary enterprise and the Kotovsk Town Administration seeking to have the flat repaired, and further claimed compensation for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0304JUD004817199

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2004

4 mars 2004

being able to repossess the second flat, nine years and seven months before being able to repossess the third flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619JUD000454309

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2012

19 juin 2012

The rights of both the allocation right holders (public bodies which nominally controlled the flats) and the occupancy right holders were regulated by law (the Housing Act 1984, which is still in force

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1127JUD004193298

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2003

27 novembre 2003

    The applicant complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that it   had been unable to recover possession of its flats within a reasonable time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC000801908

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

    Civil proceedings On 3 November 2004 the applicant concluded a contract with M. on the purchase of M.’s flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD002531508

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2012

18 décembre 2012

    On 1   July 2004 the applicant was delivered an ownership certificate to the flat. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1003JUD004672611

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2013

3 octobre 2013

    What constitutes a flat is defined under the Lease of Flats Act ( Zakon o najmu stanova , Official Gazette nos. 91/1996, 48/1998, 66/1998, 22/2006) in the following terms: Section 2 “(1)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD000259916

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

    On the same day, 25 August 2015, from 22.28 to 23.25, a search of another flat at Zolotoustivska street in Kyiv (“the second flat”), which was occupied by both applicants, was carried out

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0923DEC005288919

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2025

23 septembre 2025

Ms Satı Sibel Cıngı (“the second applicant”), who was alone in the applicants’ flat when the incident occurred, suffered from the effects of the tear gas released into the room. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116865

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2013

30 janvier 2013

place and that both took away items from the flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1216JUD000418410

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2014

16 décembre 2014

taken place and that both had taken away items from the flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0731JUD005963400

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2003

31 juillet 2003

    She is the owner of a flat in Rome, which she had let to M.T.O.T. 6.

Source officielle

Page 21 sur 173

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.