The Government argued that the applicant company had lost its victim status. 6.

Thus, since 2008 and long before the domestic courts dealt with the matter of compensation the second applicant lost any interest to pursue the application before the Court.

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

The Court was not in a position to calculate the value of the lost opportunity by carrying out a detailed analysis of the strength of the applicants’ cases and/or any likely awards.

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law   no.

  The applicant submitted that the rejection of his claim for the adjustment of the due compensation with the inflation rate had prevented him from receiving adequate compensation for property lost

February 2000 the High Court held that, since the Grahams enjoyed factual possession of the land from January 1984 and adverse possession took effect from September 1984, the applicant companies had lost

The Government argued mainly that the applicants had lost their victim status because they had benefited from the remedy offered by Law no.

The applicants were required to submit their observations in reply, as well as their just satisfaction claims, however, the contact with the applicants has been lost (see appended table for details).

Tous représentés par Me Martin CALMET, membre de la SARL DESWARTE - CALMET, avocat au barreau de NOUMEA 05/10/2023 : Copie revêtue de la formule exécutoire - Me Martin CALMET et Me Séverine LOSTE

    The Government also submitted that the applicant had lost his victim status, for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention, since the District Court had appreciated the lapse of time as

    The Government contested that argument, arguing in particular that the applicant had lost his victim status because the courts having so far proceeded with his case had taken into account

The Government pleaded that the applicants had lost their victim status due to the fact that they had benefitted from the remedy offered by Law no.

In the meantime the court had lost part of the case file and, for that reason, the hearing listed for 10   July   1998 was cancelled.

  On 10 April 1991 the applicant's representative informed the Commission that he had lost contact with the applicant and that he would take some final steps to trace his whereabouts and take instructions

On 26 February 2002 the Municipal Court delivered a judgment whereby it awarded the applicant 202,429.81 Croatian kunas (HRK) in compensation for lost earnings, together with statutory default interest

The court ordered the seaport company to compensate the claimants for lost earnings and non-pecuniary damage.

It found that the first-instance court had failed to explain why it had awarded the applicant lost income for the entire period until his disability retirement.

Once the one-year tenancy agreement had ended, the applicants had lost their right to live in that housing.