chambre sociale de la cour d'appel de Lyon refuse systématiquement d'accorder tout renvoi sollicité par les parties; que dans ces conditions, la possibilité de renvoi d'une affaire est purement théorique

qu'en l'espèce, Mme [E] faisait valoir que dans son jugement du 13 décembre 2016, confirmé par un arrêt irrévocable de la cour d'appel de Riom du 5 mars 2018, le tribunal paritaire des baux ruraux de Thiers

to attend, thus breaching the victims’ rights.

in this case and   DECIDES to close the examination of this case.

the choices that they made in this respect.

In 2013 the applicant’s trials commenced in Turkey and in Germany. At the time the European Court gave its judgment in the present case, those proceedings were still pending.

, and for this reason the defendant must be punished for this act.

The applicants rightly emphasised this point; nonetheless, this factor could not be considered as having caused the death of the their relative.

The Government relied in this respect on the minutes of the ConEC meeting of 29 September 2005, which made no mention of those individuals as PEC members for the relevant polling stations. 29.

However, by [making those statements] he did not carry out the actus reus of the offence of defamation. The court reached this conclusion in view of the following.

This omission had been chiefly due to the fact that the criminal law had not properly equipped those courts to do so rather than to the manner in which they had dealt with the case.

offence, but following the applicant’s complaints those decisions were overruled.

Thus, in spite of the retrospective nature of the contested measure, the authorities had provided the taxpayers with prior information enabling them to anticipate its effects.

For the moment, the balance between the public interest in the protection of the vulnerable and the preservation of life on the one hand and the private interests of those minded to commit suicide on the

The High Court rejected this defence and on .. February 1971 ordered that the applicant should pay the 10% legacy duty. The applicant did not appeal against this judgment.

This outcome was in accordance with the observations that the Norwegian State had submitted in those proceedings, as allowed by the relevant rules.

salarié non rémunérée par l'employeur, correspond au nombre d'heures de travail réellement effectuées au cours du mois considéré (horaire collectif) et non pas à un nombre d'heures forfaitaire et théorique

Certain information about the Alevis was taught in the 9th grade, but, in the absence of instruction in the basic elements of this faith in primary and secondary school, this was insufficient to compensate

about the measures taken preventing new violations of the same kind as those found in the present judgment; this information appears in the appendix to this resolution; Having satisfied itself that on