No appeal having been submitted, this decision became final on 14 May 2004. 15.

In this respect it also relied on Article 377.1 of the Civil Code, which specified that a claim period started to run on the date when a person first became aware or ought to have become aware of a violation

    A judicial decision becomes legally binding after the appeal court has examined the matter (Article 209 § 1).

This judgment became binding on 20 August 2004, and was enforced in January–July 2005. 8.

No appeal was lodged and the judgment became final. 10.

No appeals were lodged and this judgment became final on 30 August 2008. On 9 September 2008 the Administrative Court issued a writ of execution for the judgment of 30 July 2008.

The widespread problem of child sexual abuse had also become well-known over the preceding decade.

After a certain period of time the applicants’ convictions became spent or were lifted by a court.

    At no point during the proceeding did the applicant argue that the prosecution had become time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations.

No appeal was lodged and the judgment became final and enforceable fifteen   days later.

On 26 April 2002, after the sale became final, the applicant company requested delivery of the telephones.

In August 1991 a deportation order was made against him, but he did not become aware of its existence until it was served on him on 6 October 1992 when he attempted to regularise his immigration status

On 28 November 2019 the judgment in question became final. 10.     On 14   September 2020 the enforcement proceedings in respect of the 2015 judgment were terminated. 11.

In 1999 a regional commercial court found in K.’s favour and an appellate panel upheld the judgment, following which it became enforceable and a writ of execution was issued.

Accordingly the applicants became foster parents of six children.

judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Stankov and the United Macedonian Organisation Ilinden, delivered on 2 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Posokhov case delivered on 4   March 2003 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

The decision became final on 25 February 2000 when the Supreme Court of Justice dismissed the appeal in cassation lodged by the applicant.

On 29   September   2005 this judgment was upheld by the Regional Court and became enforceable. 20.

The Court further notes that the applicant became aware of his right to additional damages during the first set of compensation proceedings with the submission of an expert report dated 25 May 2004 or