CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

19 549 résultats pour « Leneel »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11815

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2018

18 janvier 2018

Law – Article 8: Even though it was foreseeable for high-level athletes, this requirement of transparency and availability sufficed for the obligations complained of to be regarded as impacting on the

Page 22 sur 978

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0120DEC001242021

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2022

20 janvier 2022

The compensation proceedings had taken place, before four levels of jurisdiction, from 14 September 2007 until the service on 4   September 2020 of the Constitutional Court’s decision no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0411JUD002453517

Admin. suprême

11 avril 2024

11 avril 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11520

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2017

30 mai 2017

Accordingly, the level of the Court’s scrutiny would depend on which aspect of the right to free elections was in issue.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0620JUD003273419

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2024

20 juin 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1114JUD004267123

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2024

14 novembre 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0222JUD001837117

Admin. suprême

22 février 2024

22 février 2024

    Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of justifying the overall length of the proceedings at the national level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC002746605

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

respect of length) 2 April 2012 6 July 2012 1,500 per applicant 2. 25966/07 08/06/2007 Katerina Dimitrova IBUSHEVA 1919 Plovdiv 15/07/2002– ongoing Rei-vindicatio proceedings 9 years and 5 months (3 levels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1220JUD005784914

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2018

20 décembre 2018

    10383/15 17/02/2015 Márk Norbert Darabos 25/01/1975 Karsai Dániel András Budapest 04/09/2007   19/06/2014   6 year(s) and 9 month(s) and 16 day(s) 3 level(s) of jurisdiction &#

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0603DEC005711610

Admin. suprême

3 juin 2014

3 juin 2014

Under section 43 of the Act the amount of child allowance paid could not be less than the amount of the minimum subsistence level established by law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0312DEC001565706

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2013

12 mars 2013

Introduction date Applicant’s name, date of birth, place of residence, name of representative (if any) Length of proceedings, levels of jurisdiction Date of the unilateral declaration and compensation

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0710JUD003673122

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2025

10 juillet 2025

of jurisdiction and the third civil proceedings had lasted fifteen years before one court level.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-221701

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2022

15 novembre 2022

MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the independence and impartiality of the Arbitration Committee of the Turkish Football Federation (TFF) which dismissed a claim brought by the applicant, a top-level

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0117DEC000126215

Admin. suprême

17 janvier 2019

17 janvier 2019

Kkt   Gaal Szabolcs Budapest 08/03/2006     26/04/2012   23/03/2007     08/04/2014   1 year(s) and 16 day(s) 2 level(s) of jurisdiction     1 year(s) and 11

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0319DEC004197619

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2020

19 mars 2020

In particular, the Court notes that the proceedings lasted some four and a half years for two levels of jurisdiction (see appended table), of which period the applicant was unavailable for justice – not

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1019DEC000693708

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2017

19 octobre 2017

Date of introduction Applicant name Date of birth Start of proceedings End of proceedings Total length Levels of jurisdiction 6937/08 22/01/2008 Sergiy Leonidovych Shanin 29/06/1965 23/10/1997   &

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0909DEC000162121

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2021

9 septembre 2021

The resultant length, on two levels of jurisdiction, cannot yet be considered to have exceeded a reasonable time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC004049621

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

The proceedings thus lasted less than three years and five months for two levels of jurisdiction, which cannot be considered as exceeding a reasonable time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0825DEC004337321

Admin. suprême

25 août 2022

25 août 2022

The proceedings thus lasted less than two years and nine months for two levels of jurisdiction, which cannot be considered as exceeding a reasonable time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1110DEC000251221

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2021

10 novembre 2021

In particular, the Court notes that the proceedings lasted five years before three levels of jurisdiction, which cannot be considered excessive.

Source officielle