CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-109456
14 décembre 2011
0pt; text-align:justify } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } FIFTH SECTION Application no. 14011/08 Viktor Kirsanovich GEYEV and Viktor Viktorovich GEYEV against Ukraine lodged on 5 March
Page 22 sur 448
BRINGER, Jean-Marc
31/12/2013
Voir →
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205DEC004971220
5 février 2026
Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, § 49, 1 March 2022), unlike in the applicant’s case.
PRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-616052-621165
24 septembre 2005
On 16 March 2001 the Nice public prosecutor’s office wrote to the applicant inviting him to bring proceedings himself against the municipality of Eze.
ECLI:CEDH:001-242666
11 mars 2025
2025 FOURTH SECTION Application no. 19853/23 Thomas LEONHARTSBERGER against Austria lodged on 15 May 2023 communicated on 11 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns a complaint
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214DEC000524603
14 décembre 2010
He did not bring a civil action in tort to seek compensation for the infringement of his personal rights. B.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0511DEC001771609
11 mai 2010
On 16 March 2007 at 1.25 p.m. the police arrested the applicant's son, Tomasz Zegan, because of his aggressive behaviour at a tram stop.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-12644
31 octobre 2019
In any event, in case of an unfavourable outcome in the use of the preventive and/or compensatory remedy, an applicant could bring complaints before the Constitutional Court which also had the competence
Cour d'Appel
6253cac6bd3db21cbdd8c04c
5 février 2008
de la SCP AIMONETTI-BLANC-BRINGER, avocats au barreau de MILLAU Madame Brigitte X... épouse D...
6253ca51bd3db21cbdd8aa91
23 janvier 2008
né le 06 Septembre 1928 à LA CROIX BARREZ ... 12400 ST AFFRIQUE représenté par la SCP ARGELLIES-WATREMET, avoués à la Cour assisté de la SCP LARGUIER-AIMONETTI-BLANC-BRINGER-MAZARS, avocats au barreau
ECLI:CEDH:002-5438
26 mars 2002
12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 40 March
ECLI:CEDH:001-114368
8 octobre 2012
margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s32563E28 { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt } FIFTH SECTION Application no. 19288/10 Oleksandr Kostyantynovych YAKOVENKO against Ukraine lodged on 25 March
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49208
1 mai 1969
Convention (art. 5, art. 6, art. 13), alleged to have taken place during his detention pending trial and during the judicial proceedings instituted against him in Austria; Whereas the Commission on 29 March
ECLI:CEDH:002-11416
16 mars 2017
12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 205 March
ECLI:CEDH:003-1286195-1340903
9 mars 2005
Hundreds of other applicants to the Court in the same situation have one more week (until March 17 2005) to apply to the Polish courts under the new law, introduced on 17 September 2004 (the 2004
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56173
24 février 2003
:justify } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Resolution ResDH(2003)8 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 21 December 2000 (final on 21 March
ECLI:CEDH:002-9549
26 juin 2014
On 30 March 2011 the applicant lodged an application for release with a court of first instance, which quashed the detention order sixteen days later, on 15 April 2011.
ECLI:CEDH:002-10911
15 septembre 2015
.) - 51097/13 Decision 15.9.2015 [Section V] Article 2 Positive obligations Failure to bring an action to establish State responsibility following suicide in custody: inadmissible Facts – The applicants
ECLI:CEDH:002-2681
5 juin 2007
– to compensate for the excessive length of the proceedings – should have been paid within six months of the time when the compensation decision became enforceable, without the applicants having to bring
ECLI:CEDH:001-55404
13 octobre 1978
Crown, to which the convention was extended by a declaration of the United Kingdom made in pursuance of Article 63 (art. 63) of the convention; Recalling that the case had been brought on 11 March
ECLI:CEDH:002-10431
23 mars 1994
March 1994 Ravnsborg v.