on 13 June 2019 communicated on 27 October 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the complaints raised by the applicant, who is a former high-ranking official, in relation to the alleged

In each case, a certain number of supporting signatures submitted by each applicant was invalidated for a number of reasons, including alleged inauthenticity of supporting signatures (“signatures made

Ukraine lodged on 18 May 2020 and 23 June 2020 respectively communicated on 15 January 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The applications mainly concern the lawfulness of the applicants’ detention and the alleged

Meanwhile, in 2016 the first applicant’s mother lodged a complaint with prosecuting authorities about his alleged ill-treatment by the police.

procedural limb of Article 3 of the Convention, having regard in particular to his age, medical condition and state of dependency on the alleged aggressor?

Secondly, the applicant complains that his right under Article   7 was violated due to the allegedly insufficient clarity of the legal provisions relevant to his prosecution and the alleged overturning

Unless complainants alleged physical injury at the hands of State agents, the authorities could not be required to open an investigation.

also not allowed him to attend the Court's examination of the second alleged rape victim.

  1 to the Convention about the alleged breach of its property rights. THE LAW A.     Complaints under Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention 26.

The applicant alleged that at one point police officers entered the back of the car and punched him in the face.

THE APPLICANTS’ ARREST AND ALLEGED ILL-TREATMENT 2.

The District Governor asked the Ovacık Gendarmerie Headquarters to provide information about the alleged incident.

    Facts in dispute The parties dispute each other’s submissions concerning the ill-treatment alleged by the applicant and his alleged ensuing attempts to lodge a complaint with the prosecutor

The District Governor asked the Ovacık Gendarmerie Headquarters for information about the alleged incident.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION 17.

    The applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by the police 9.

The Court’s temporal jurisdiction was to be determined in relation to the facts constitutive of the alleged interference.

Finally, relying on Article 13 of the Convention the applicant alleged that there was no effective remedy provided in the domestic system for his complaints under Articles 5 and 6. THE LAW 1.

before it, and that there is no causal link between the excessive length of the proceedings and the damage alleged.