Now you will have noted straight away ladies and gentlemen that I’ve referred here to charge 8 and you will of course recall that the accused have been acquitted of that charge but this does not mean that

There would also have been no need for the applicant to have waited for the written decision of the Independent Finance Panel to be served in order to lodge his complaint with the Constitutional Court

obtained a ruling upholding his right to have his case heard before the criminal courts within a reasonable time, as set forth in Article 6 § 1 of the Convention.

By comparing the applications, the Court notes that the same applicants raised the same complaints about their detention in Diavata prison during the same periods, and that they have not submitted any

SELARL GKG (TOQUE 22), avocat au barreau de GUADELOUPE Monsieur François A... ... 97150 SAINT-MARTIN représenté par Me SELARL GKG (TOQUE 22), avocat au barreau de GUADELOUPE LA SNC HAVANE

The cases have been struck out following friendly settlements in which the following amounts, in Italian lire (ITL), are to be paid for any non-pecuniary damage, pecuniary damage, costs and expenses.

    Principal facts   The applicant, Alexandru Bragadireanu, is a Romanian national who was born in 1954.

Those relating to impartiality and the presumption of innocence in the context of a judge’s participation in previous decisions on the same subject matter have been set out in Gorše v.

He also argued that the witnesses should have been heard by the disciplinary court. 12.

In any event, all evidence should have been tested before the courts.

Shoileva-Stambolova and Stefan Alexandrov Shoilev, are Bulgarian nationals, born in 1937, 1961, 1966, 1958, 1930, 1964 and 1968 respectively.

The three above-mentioned houses have not been rebuilt to date.

upheld by the plenary session of the Court of Cassation ( Sezione Unite ), which in 2001 found that, due to the enactment of other legislative amendments, the system of perequazione aziendale would have

xa0;       Application No. 24413/94                       by Aleksandra

The Court therefore notes that the applicant company did not have, and could not have had, knowledge of whether its suppliers had met their VAT obligations; nor was it alleged that it had participated

width:179.93pt; display:inline-block } .s8EFC8F8 { width:32.36pt; display:inline-block } .s5A070004 { width:213.96pt; display:inline-block }   THIRD SECTION DECISION Application no. 43502/04 Alexandru

Alexandrova, Mrs I. Vandova and Mrs Z. Kalaydjieva, lawyers practising in Sofia, and Mr P. Bitsaxis, a lawyer practising in Athens. At a later stage they were represented by Mr   A.

    On 2 October 2009 the Consiglio di Stato issued a decision declaring that it did not have jurisdiction to decide the applicants’ claim. 20.

Moreover, owing to the lapse of time since the lodging of the applications, new situations might have arisen: the properties could have been transferred, donated or inherited within the legal system of