Having regard to the nature of the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration, as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases –

  The applicants questioned the accuracy of the bank statements and the exact amounts due and sought further information.

By decision of 24 September 2009 the City Court granted A fees in the amount of DKK 183,862.50 (approximately EUR 24,700) plus VAT and reimbursement of costs in the amount of DKK 2,060 which was provisionally

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

In the event of failure to pay this amount within the above ‑ mentioned three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from the expiry of that period until settlement

The   applicant opted for the continuation of his membership and chose to pay voluntary contributions in an amount equal to half of the maximum contribution rate. 8.

the amount to be TRY   156,881.

; 400) to the 1 st applicant, Dimitrios Giataganas. 2) The amount of four hundred euros (400) to the 2 nd applicant, Zahid Abbas. 3) The amount of one thousand seven hundred euros (1   700) to the

They argued that the amounts of compensation awarded to them were insufficient.

Thus, the minimum amount payable under the law was fixed at GEL 1,000 (EUR 454), whilst the maximum amount within the range was set at GEL 2,000 (EUR 908).

From that date until 14   March 2001 the applicants deposited certain amounts with their accounts at Iktisat Bank.

She further claimed interest on those amounts from 2007 to the date of the judgment, to be calculated by the Court.

After taxation, the net amount of her current pension is PLN 1,716.81.

relative à l’aide juridique, sous réserve que Me Amrouche renonce à percevoir la somme correspondant à la part contributive de l’Etat au titre de l’aide juridictionnelle.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 12   February 1996 and the due amount was paid to the applicant on 28 January 1998.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 4   November 1996 and the due amount was paid to the applicant on 4   February 1998.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 6   November 1995 and the due amount was paid to the applicants on 28   January 1998.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 6   November   1995 and the due amount was paid to the applicants on 4 February 1998.

She objected to the striking out of the application, having argued that the amount proposed did not offer her sufficient just satisfaction.

The amount would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.