sA53E5752 { width:22.78%; border:0.75pt solid #949494; padding:1.02pt 5.03pt; vertical-align:top } .s5A37263B { height:26.2pt } Published on 14 March 2022   FIRST SECTION Application no. 42559/21 Isabella

    In the evening of 9 May 2004 Zelimkhan Isayev and the fourth applicant and her child were at home at 24 Sverdlova Street. 13.

The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The observations were forwarded to the applicant, who was invited to submit his own observations. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

(a)     Disappearance of Mr Rumid Isayev and subsequent events On 7 April 2001 Mr Rumid Isayev went to the village of Lermontovo, Chechnya, to visit his relatives.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

They were represented before the Court by Mr E. Bingöl, a lawyer practising in Van. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

Isabelle X... épouse Y... Z.../ Simon Y...

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

At the office the three men were blindfolded, their hands were bound and they were put in an APC which took them to the main base of the federal military forces in Khankala. 16.

They denied that State agents were responsible for his disappearance.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.

COUR D'APPEL DE [Localité 5] 3ème chambre civile section 1 N° RG 24/01811 - N° Portalis DBVR-V-B7I-FNOE Ordonnance N° /2025 du 15 Janvier 2026 O R D O N N A N C E Nous, Laëtitia WELTER

  Ms Dogru, then aged eleven, and Ms Kervanci, aged twelve, both Muslims, were enrolled in the first year of a state secondary school in Flers for the 1998-1999 academic year.

The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent. The applicants complained under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 and Article   6 § 1 of the Convention.

They argue that their requests were disregarded and that they were beaten severely and were forced to sign waivers for their deportation to Israel.