CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0829DEC002724009
29 août 2017
The court was thus unable to endorse the District Court’s decision. 45. On 30 June 2009 the District Court decided anew to dismiss the first applicant’s appeal.
Page 23 sur 71
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0208JUD002840095
8 février 2000
On 5 June 1992 the applicant’s trial started before the Nova Gorica District Court ( Okrožno sodišče – “the District Court”). On the same day the case was adjourned. 7.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC002470511
13 janvier 2015
On 27 October 2009 the Nacka District Court ( tingsrätt ) acquitted the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1129DEC000040206
29 novembre 2011
On 17 June 2003 the Voroshilovsky District Court of Donetsk allowed her claim in part and awarded her UAH 100,000 (about EUR 15,410) in compensation for non-pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0325DEC000476108
25 mars 2014
On 23 February 2006 the Zaliznychnyy District Court of Simferopol partly allowed the applicant’s claim and awarded him pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages. Both parties appealed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0507DEC002313407
7 mai 2013
Stephen Phillips Angelika Nußberger Deputy Registrar President Appendix No.
Pôle 2 - Chambre 2
616396435fe465b53b77f463
5 novembre 2010
APPELANTS: Monsieur [Z] [R] [G] [Adresse 4] [Adresse 4] Mademoiselle [X] [H] [T] [Adresse 4] [Adresse 4] représentés par la SCP MIRA-BETTAN, avoués à la Cour assistés de Maître Jean-Philippe
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC005146911
On 19 May 2009 the Uppsala District Court ( tingsrätt ) acquitted the applicant.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305DEC003015708
5 mars 2013
On 28 June 2004 the Maribor District Court found the applicant guilty as charged. He appealed. On 21 April 2005 the Maribor Higher Court rejected the appeal and upheld the first-instance judgment.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0425JUD002272207
25 avril 2013
Stephen Phillips Boštjan M. Zupančič Deputy Registrar President APPENDIX 1 (inadmissible applications) No.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD007186213
10 mars 2020
On 21 February 2014 the Zamoskvoretskiy District Court found the applicant guilty as charged.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0207JUD005781809
7 février 2017
another venue in the Northern Administrative District.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0623JUD004656410
23 juin 2015
Such entities are officially registered with the local District Authority ( obvodný úrad ). The defendant was so registered with the District Authority in Bratislava. 7.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
Igoshinc/Russie
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD002106207
21 juin 2016
Le 6 mai 2005, le procureur de district avait également refusé l’ouverture d’une instruction pénale.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305JUD003820116
5 mars 2019
Meanwhile, on 13 November 2013 Mr and Ms Z. lodged an adoption application with the Primorskiy District Court of St Petersburg (“the District Court”). 29 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1209DEC007520111
9 décembre 2014
On 12 June 2006 the applicant and the insurance company resolved the claims for compensation through a friendly settlement which was confirmed in a judgment by the District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0827DEC003422912
27 août 2013
On 1 October 1988 the Augsburg District Court opened insolvency proceedings over the applicant’s medical practice.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-152553
27 janvier 2015
On 6 October 2006 he was imprisoned in the special detention centre of the Lubedtsi District of Moscow. On 6 and 7 October 2006, hearing before the Litkarino District Court.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-3235530-3623310
2 septembre 2010
In December 2002, following an application by the applicant’s brother on the recommendation of a psychiatrist, the district prosecutor ordered the applicant’s committal to a psychiatric hospital
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0317JUD002103705
17 mars 2011
In the evening of the same day, the applicant was arrested on suspicion of storing drugs and taken to the district police station.