CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2053248-2172644
5 juillet 2007
They were asked about their identity, whether they had taken part in the hostilities in Chechnya and what they knew about Ruslan Alikhadzhiyev.
Page 23 sur 1002
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-183999
22 mai 2018
What were the precise targets, in the city of Tskhinvali, of the rocket launches and what was their distance from civilian premises?
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0510DEC001645490
10 mai 1990
Furthermore, the applicant submits that what is of primary importance in assessing this risk is what happened to him in Lebanon, and not what he told the
ECLI:CEDH:001-173022
23 mars 2017
What act (document or physical action of a public authority) constituted the interference in the present cases? What was the law applicable to the relevant form of deprivation of property?
ECLI:CEDH:003-68234-68702
11 juillet 2000
or not, the intensity and frequency of these interrogations also suggested that right from the first session, which lasted until 7 p.m. or just after, Mr Dikme could have gained some idea of what
ECLI:CEDH:003-2383983-2578455
12 juin 2008
On the first occasion a shot was fired when one of the applicants left the house to see what was happening. Neither of the brothers has been seen since their abduction.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2091
20 mars 2008
The applicants’ claims for damages had effectively been dismissed by the domestic courts because they had failed to demonstrate to what extent State negligence had caused damage exceeding what was inevitable
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405DEC000073805
5 avril 2011
The applicant does not specify what kind of requests and complaints were missing.
ECLI:CEDH:002-9195
3 octobre 2013
The doctor tried to reassure the employees and explained what precautions should be taken.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152338
19 janvier 2015
What was the legal basis for the relevant authorities’ actions aimed at alienating the applicant’s private property?
ECLI:CEDH:001-214943
16 décembre 2021
ten petroleum production licences under section 3-3 of the Petroleum Act: (a) Observing the reasons provided by the Supreme Court in paragraphs 148 and 161-162 of its judgment: to what
ECLI:CEDH:001-187655
15 octobre 2018
What was the target object being picketed and what the “campaigning” ( агитация ) and related object of “campaigning” consisted of?
ECLI:CEDH:001-207452
9 décembre 2020
On 20 October 2019 a district inspector called her and asked her to explain what happened and send him photographs of the children to make sure that they were alive and well.
ECLI:CEDH:001-193190
26 avril 2019
If yes, when and on what basis?
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0913DEC003306707
13 septembre 2011
must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and the relevant authorities and what
ECLI:CEDH:001-211549
8 juillet 2021
What was the target object being picketed? (b) In so far as the domestic courts in cases listed in Appendix I referred to the Presidential Decree no.
ECLI:CEDH:002-13379
31 août 2021
That is what had been done in the applicant’s case on a number of separate occasions.
ECLI:CEDH:001-176183
13 juillet 2017
In 2005 an individual sued the applicant for payment of what would later be established as some 20,250 euros (EUR) on the basis of a loan arrangement between them.
ECLI:CEDH:001-166881
1 septembre 2016
The programme reconstructed what was termed as “the crime committed by the member of the 7 November Movement, Levan Gogichaishvili.”
ECLI:CEDH:002-3753
2 août 2005
police authorities and had entered premises under military or police control and never been seen again, it was incumbent upon the Government to provide a plausible and satisfactory explanation as to what