This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 29   May   1995 and the due amount was paid to the applicant in 1998.

The due amount was paid to the applicant on 3 February 1998.

The amount would be free of any tax that may be applicable.

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 11   December 1995 and the due amount was paid to the applicant on 23   February 1998.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 9   October 1995 and the due amount was paid to the applicants on 13   February 1998.

In particular, the amount indicated sub a) represents difference between 5% of the theoretical cumulated amount and the actual cumulated amount.

on the basis of an official on-site visit in order to fix the amount of the just satisfaction awarded to the applicant company.

The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.

They offered to pay the applicant the amount detailed in the appended table and invited the Court to strike the application out of the list of cases in accordance with Article   37 §   1  

failure of the domestic courts to apply any default interest to the compensation amount.

The amounts would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 16   December 1993 and the due amount was paid to the applicant on 23   January 1998.

This decision was upheld by the Court of Cassation on 6   November 1995 and the due amount was paid to the applicant on 28   January 1998.

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which is consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

The due amount was paid to the applicant on 6 February 1998.

Noting the admissions contained in the Government’s declaration as well as the amount of compensation proposed – which are consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases – the Court considers that

The amount would be payable within three months from the date of notification of the Court’s decision.