CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68413-68881

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2001

30 janvier 2001

He did not appeal against this judgment, which accordingly became final, and he served his prison sentence from 16 April to 19 July 1996.   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-115515

Admin. suprême

29 novembre 2012

29 novembre 2012

The decision became final on 4 August 2008. On 18 November 2009 the applicant, represented by his legal guardian, lodged a complaint with the Constitutional Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD003727011

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

    Application of the general principles to the present case (a)     Domestic court decisions which became final before 11 December 2008 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1009DEC003184811

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2012

9 octobre 2012

Special considerations may apply in exceptional cases where an applicant first avails himself of a domestic remedy and only at a later stage becomes aware, or should have become aware, of circumstances

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1582586-1667168

Admin. suprême

16 février 2006

16 février 2006

In the absence of an appeal, the judgment became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1023JUD007519316

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2025

23 octobre 2025

aware or should have become aware of a breached right, whereas under Article 273 of the CCP the   assumption of the debt should not have affected the running of the limitation period. 12 .

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1185902-1231526

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2004

10 novembre 2004

Eurogold Madencilik (which subsequently became known as Normandy Madencilik A.Ş. ) obtained the right to prospect for gold.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0921JUD001485303

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 2006

21 septembre 2006

    The applicant replied that the judgment of 5 April 2002 had been quashed two years after it had become binding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2613

Admin. suprême

3 juillet 2007

3 juillet 2007

The law stipulated that compensation could only be requested pursuant to its provisions and that all further claims against the German State and German companies became extinct.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56096

Admin. suprême

24 juin 2002

24 juin 2002

as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Lagrange case delivered on 10 October 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56348

Admin. suprême

24 février 2004

24 février 2004

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Hoffmann case delivered on 11   October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56174

Admin. suprême

24 février 2003

24 février 2003

to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Devlin case delivered on 30 October 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56219

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the L. case delivered on 27 April 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56107

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2002

22 juillet 2002

”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Anagnostopoulos and others case delivered on 7 November 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56122

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Gaganuş and others case delivered on 5 June 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56124

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2002

21 octobre 2002

referred to as “the Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Küçük case delivered on 10 July 2001 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55864

Admin. suprême

29 mai 2000

29 mai 2000

Convention”), Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Riera Blume and others case delivered on 14 October 1999 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68439

Admin. suprême

23 février 2005

23 février 2005

“the Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the İlkay case delivered on 8 January 2004 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0119DEC001859605

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2010

19 janvier 2010

In the absence of an appeal the judgment became final on 7   November 2003.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-171495

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2017

24 janvier 2017

The judgment was not appealed against and became final. On 10   June 2014 enforcement proceedings were instituted. On an unspecified date Ms   E.N.

Source officielle

Page 24 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →